Corporate crisis management on social media: A morality violations perspective

dc.contributor.authorZheng, Bowenen
dc.contributor.authorBi, Gongbingen
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Hefuen
dc.contributor.authorLowry, Paul Benjaminen
dc.contributor.departmentBusiness Information Technologyen
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-24T20:41:02Zen
dc.date.available2020-11-24T20:41:02Zen
dc.date.issued2020-07en
dc.description.abstractCommunication via a social network function enabled by social media has greatly empowered consumers' secondary crisis communication, as compared to a firm's crisis communication, and has thus changed corporate crisis management. This study aims to uncover consumers' decision process of engaging in secondary crisis communication in a social media context. Drawing on the social control perspective and impression management theory,this study examines the role of perceived morality violations and consumers' susceptibility to social influence in shaping consumers' secondary crisis communication in corporate crises. Moreover, leveraging cognitive dissonance theory, this study further examines the effects of corporate responses on the process of consumers' secondary crisis communication. A survey design with four scenarios was conducted to test a series of hypotheses relating to the decision process of secondary crisis communication. Our empirical results demonstrate that consumers' approach to secondary crisis communication on social media depends largely to the degree to which they perceive moral violations in the firms' crisis response. The findings also show that consumers tend to want to believe they are doing the "right thing" when considering secondary crisis communication and thus are afraid of being disliked by others for their purchasing decisions related to a firm in crisis. Such social conformance can result in a snowballing of negative word of mouth in product-harm crises cases. Findings contribute to the literature on social media crisis management and consumers' communication behavior on social media during product-harm crises.en
dc.description.notesThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC: 71921001, 71731010).en
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [NSFC: 71921001, 71731010]en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04435en
dc.identifier.issn2405-8440en
dc.identifier.issue7en
dc.identifier.othere04435en
dc.identifier.pmid32715127en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/100929en
dc.identifier.volume6en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en
dc.subjectSusceptibility to social influenceen
dc.subjectSecondary crisis communicationen
dc.subjectSocial mediaen
dc.subjectMorality violationsen
dc.subjectTechnology adoptionen
dc.subjectOrganizational theoryen
dc.subjectBusiness managementen
dc.subjectStrategic managementen
dc.subjectConsumer attitudeen
dc.subjectBusinessen
dc.titleCorporate crisis management on social media: A morality violations perspectiveen
dc.title.serialHeliyonen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PIIS2405844020312792.pdf
Size:
589.89 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: