Using Magneto-Rheological Dampers in Semiactive Tuned Vibration Absorbers to Control Structural Vibrations

dc.contributor.authorKoo, Jeong-Hoien
dc.contributor.committeecochairAhmadian, Mehdien
dc.contributor.committeecochairSetareh, Mehdien
dc.contributor.committeememberKasarda, Mary E. F.en
dc.contributor.committeememberMurray, Thomas M.en
dc.contributor.committeememberLeo, Donalden
dc.contributor.departmentMechanical Engineeringen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T20:16:25Zen
dc.date.adate2003-10-03en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T20:16:25Zen
dc.date.issued2003-07-23en
dc.date.rdate2004-10-03en
dc.date.sdate2003-09-19en
dc.description.abstractSince their invention in the early 1900s, Tuned Vibration Absorbers (TVAs) have shown to be effective in suppressing vibrations of machines and structures. A vibration absorber is a vibratory subsystem attached to a primary system. It normally consists of a mass, a spring, and a damper. Mounted to the primary system, a TVA counteracts the motions of the primary system, "absorbing" the primary structure's vibrations. A conventional passive TVA, however, is only effective when it is tuned properly, hence, the name "tuned" vibration absorber. In many practical applications, inevitable off-tuning (or mistuning) of a TVA occurs because of the system's operating conditions or parameter changes over time. For example, the mass in a building floor could change by moving furnishings, people gathering, etc., which can "off-tune" TVAs. When TVAs are off-tuned, their effectiveness is sharply reduced. Moreover, the off-tuned TVAs can excessively amplify the vibration levels of the primary structures; therefore, not only rendering the TVA useless but also possibly causing damage to the structures. Off-tuning is one of the major problems of conventional passive TVAs. This study proposes a novel semiactive TVA, which strives to combine the best features of passive and active TVA systems. The semiactive TVA in this study includes a Magneto-Rheological (MR) damper that is used as a controllable damping element, for providing the real-time adjustability that is needed for improving the TVA performance. This study is conducted in two phases. The first phase provides a numerical investigation on a two-degree-of-freedom (2-DOF) numerical model in which the primary structure is coupled with a TVA. The numerical investigation considers four semiactive control methods for the MR TVAs, in addition to an equivalent passive TVA. These numerical models are optimally tuned using numerical optimization techniques to compare each TVA system. These tuned systems then serve as the basis for numerical parametric studies for further evaluation of their dynamic performance. The parametric study covers the effects of damping, as well as system parameter variations (off-tuning). The results indicates that semiactive TVAs are more effective in reducing the maximum vibrations of the primary structure and are more robust when subjected to off-tuning. Additionally, the numerical study identifies the "On-off Displacement-Based Groundhook control (on-off DBG)" as the most suitable control method for the semiactive TVA among control methods considered in this study. For the second phase of this study, an experimental study is performed on a test setup, which represents a 2-DOF structure model coupled with an MR TVA. Using this setup, a series of tests are conducted in the same manner as the numerical study to evaluate the performance of the semiactive TVA. The primary purposes of the experiment are to further evaluate the most promising semiactive control methods and to serve as a "proof-of-concept" of the effectiveness of this MR TVA for floor vibration applications. The results indicate that the semiactive TVA with displacement-based groundhook control outperforms the equivalent passive TVA in reducing the maximum vibrations of the primary structure. This confirms the numerical result that identifies on-off DBG control method as the "best" control method for the MR TVA among four semiactive control schemes considered. The experimental robustness study is also conducted, focusing on the dynamic performance of both the passive and the semiactive TVAs when the mass of the primary system changes (mass off-tuning). The mass of the primary system varied from -23 % to +23 % of its nominal value by adding and removing external masses. The experimental results show that the semiactive TVA is more robust to changes in the primary mass than the passive TVA. These results justify the benefits of the use of semiactive MR TVAs in structures, such as building floor systems. The off-tuning analysis further suggests that, in practice, semiactive TVAs should be tuned slightly less than their optimum in order to compensate for any added masses to the structure. Additionally, the lessons learned from the experimental study have paved the way for implementing the semiactive MR TVA on a test floor, which is currently in progress under a separate study.en
dc.description.degreePh. D.en
dc.identifier.otheretd-09192003-103018en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-09192003-103018/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/29023en
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartETD_KOO.pdfen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectMagnetorheologicalen
dc.subjectMagneto-Rheologicalen
dc.subjectSemiactiveen
dc.subjectTVAen
dc.subjectFloor Vibrationsen
dc.subjectJeong-Hoi Kooen
dc.subjectHuman Vibrationsen
dc.subjectGroundhooken
dc.subjectVibrationsen
dc.subjectSemiactive Controlen
dc.subjectTuned Vibration Absorberen
dc.subjectTMDen
dc.subjectTuned Mass Damperen
dc.subjectMR Damperen
dc.titleUsing Magneto-Rheological Dampers in Semiactive Tuned Vibration Absorbers to Control Structural Vibrationsen
dc.typeDissertationen
thesis.degree.disciplineMechanical Engineeringen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.namePh. D.en

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ETD_KOO.pdf
Size:
3.2 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format