Deep Energy Foundations: Geotechnical Challenges and Design Considerations
| dc.contributor.author | Abdelaziz, Sherif Lotfy Abdel Motaleb | en |
| dc.contributor.committeechair | Olgun, Celal Guney | en |
| dc.contributor.committeechair | Martin, James R. | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Dove, Joseph E. | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Mauldon, Matthew | en |
| dc.contributor.department | Civil and Environmental Engineering | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-10-30T06:01:05Z | en |
| dc.date.available | 2014-10-30T06:01:05Z | en |
| dc.date.issued | 2013-05-07 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Traditionally, geothermal boreholes have utilized the ground energy for space heating and cooling. In this system, a circulation loop is placed in a small-diameter borehole typically extending to a depth of 200-300 ft. The hole is then backfilled with a mixture of sand, bentonite and/or cement. The loop is connected to a geothermal heat pump and the fluid inside the loop is circulated. The heat energy is fed into the ground for cooling in the summer and withdrawn from the ground for heating in the winter. Geothermal heat pumps work more efficiently for space heating and cooling compared to air-source heat pumps. The reason is ground-source systems use the ground as a constant temperature source which serves as a more favorable baseline compared to the ambient air temperature. A significant cost associated with any deep geothermal borehole is the drilling required for installation. Because Energy Piles perform the dual function of exchanging heat and providing structural support, and are only installed at sites where pile foundations are already required, these systems provide the thermal performance of deep geothermal systems without the additional drilling costs. Low maintenance, long lifetime, less variation in energy supply compared to solar and wind power, and environmental friendliness have been cited as additional Energy Pile advantages. Case studies show that they can significantly lower heating/cooling costs and reduce the carbon footprint. Energy cost savings for typical buildings outfitted with Energy Piles could be as much as 70 percent. The use of Energy Piles has rapidly increased over the last decade, especially in Europe where more than 500 applications are reported. Primary installations have been in Germany, Austria, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Notable projects include the 56-story high Frankfurt Main Tower in Germany, Dock E Terminal Extension at Zurich International Airport in Switzerland and the One New Change building complex in London U.K. Energy piles have seen very little use in the North America, only a handful of completed projects are known; Marine Discovery Center in Ontario, Canada, Lakefront Hotel in Geneva, New York and the Art Stable building in Seattle, Washington. Energy Piles are typically installed with cast-in-place technology (i.e. drilled shafts, continuous flight auger piles, micropiles etc.) while some driven pile applications are also reported. Other types of geotechnical structures in contact with the ground, such as shallow foundations, retaining walls, basement walls, tunnel linings and earth anchors, also offer significant potential for harnessing near-surface geothermal energy. Energy Pile design needs to integrate geotechnical, structural and heat exchange considerations. Geotechnical characteristics of the foundation soils and the level of the structural loads are typically the deciding factors for the selection and dimensioning of the pile foundations. The geothermal heat exchange capacity of an Energy Pile is a key parameter to be considered in design. Thermal characteristics of the ground as well as the heating and cooling loads from the structure need to be considered for the number of piles that will be utilized as heat exchangers. Therefore, the thermal properties of the site need to be evaluated for an Energy Pile application in addition to the traditional geotechnical characterization for foundation design. Energy Piles bring new challenges to geotechnical pile design. During a heat exchange operation, the pile will expand and contract relative to the soil as heat is injected and extracted, respectively. These relative movements have the potential to alter the shear transfer mechanism at the pile-soil interface. Furthermore, the range of temperature increases near the pile surface, though limited by practical operational guidelines, can have a significant effect on pore pressures generation and soil strength. This dissertation provides answers for several research questions including the long-term performance of Energy Piles, the applicability of the thermal conductivity tests to Energy Piles. Furthermore, it presents the results and a detailed discussion about the full scale in-situ thermo-mechanical pile load test conducted at Virginia Tech. | en |
| dc.description.degree | Ph. D. | en |
| dc.format.medium | ETD | en |
| dc.identifier.other | vt_gsexam:373 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10919/50625 | en |
| dc.publisher | Virginia Tech | en |
| dc.rights | In Copyright | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | en |
| dc.subject | Geothermal | en |
| dc.subject | Energy Piles | en |
| dc.subject | Thermo-mechanical | en |
| dc.subject | Heat Exchanger | en |
| dc.subject | Thermal Conductivity | en |
| dc.title | Deep Energy Foundations: Geotechnical Challenges and Design Considerations | en |
| dc.type | Dissertation | en |
| thesis.degree.discipline | Civil Engineering | en |
| thesis.degree.grantor | Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University | en |
| thesis.degree.level | doctoral | en |
| thesis.degree.name | Ph. D. | en |