Guidelines for small school systems in developing orientation programs for board members
dc.contributor.author | Rodgers, Sally T. | en |
dc.contributor.committeechair | Earthman, Glen I. | en |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Alexander, M. David | en |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Barham, Frank E. | en |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Fortune, Jimmie C. | en |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Parks, David J. | en |
dc.contributor.department | Educational Administration | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-03-10T21:54:36Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2017-03-10T21:54:36Z | en |
dc.date.issued | 1986 | en |
dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this study was to develop guidelines for small school divisions in Virginia to use in preparing an orientation program which would meet the needs of the new school board members. These guidelines addressed state and local concerns which had been identified through the review of literature and a questionnaire which was completed by superintendents and school board members from small school divisions in Virginia. The questionnaire was distributed to all superintendents and school board members from school divisions with fewer than five thousand students. The contents of the guidelines were determined by those items which were identified as being essential by 50 percent or more of at least one of the respondent groups. The results from this study indicated that school board members and superintendents do agree on the majority of items that were essential to an orientation program for new school board members. Thirty-eight of the sixty-nine items were regarded as essential by both respondent groups. There were eight areas in which the superintendents and school board members disagreed. These areas were also included in the guidelines. As a result of this study a set of curriculum guidelines was developed which would assist small Virginia school divisions in preparing an orientation program for new school board members. The ultimate aim of these guidelines was to improve the effectiveness of the new school board member. | en |
dc.description.degree | Ed. D. | en |
dc.format.extent | viii, 123 leaves | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10919/76490 | en |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
dc.publisher | Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University | en |
dc.relation.isformatof | OCLC# 14706168 | en |
dc.rights | In Copyright | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | en |
dc.subject.lcc | LD5655.V856 1986.R626 | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | School board members -- In-service training -- Virginia | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | School boards -- Virginia | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | School board-superintendent relationships | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Educational law and legislation -- Virginia | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Education -- Finance | en |
dc.title | Guidelines for small school systems in developing orientation programs for board members | en |
dc.type | Dissertation | en |
dc.type.dcmitype | Text | en |
thesis.degree.discipline | Educational Administration | en |
thesis.degree.grantor | Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University | en |
thesis.degree.level | doctoral | en |
thesis.degree.name | Ed. D. | en |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1