VTechWorks staff will be away for the winter holidays starting Tuesday, December 24, 2024, through Wednesday, January 1, 2025, and will not be replying to requests during this time. Thank you for your patience, and happy holidays!
 

Memory for performance feedback: a test of three self- motivation theories

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorDonlin, Joanne Macen
dc.contributor.committeechairHauenstein, Neil M. A.en
dc.contributor.committeememberAxsom, Danny K.en
dc.contributor.committeememberFoti, Roseanne J.en
dc.contributor.committeememberFranchina, Joseph J.en
dc.contributor.committeememberHarvey, Robert J.en
dc.contributor.committeememberMadigan, Robert M.en
dc.contributor.departmentPsychologyen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T21:17:53Zen
dc.date.adate2007-08-23en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T21:17:53Zen
dc.date.issued1990-04-02en
dc.date.rdate2007-08-23en
dc.date.sdate2007-08-23en
dc.description.abstractThe current study tests the adequacy of three self-motive theories to predict recall of performance feedback, memory sensitivity, and ratings of perceived accuracy. Self-enhancement (Jones, 1973) predicts individuals are motivated to maintain their self-esteem. Individuals will therefore recall positive relative to negative feedback and will rate positive feedback as more accurate. Self-consistency theory (Swann, 1985) predicts individuals are motivated to maintain their self-conceptions. Therefore they will recall feedback consistent with their expectations and rate consistent feedback as more accurate. Finally, Competence motivation (White, 1959) predicts individuals are motivated to master their environment and predicts individuals will recall feedback about important feedback dimensions, or feedback with high diagnostic value. The results clearly show individuals are biased toward recalling negative feedback. Individuals tended to recall more specific negative feedback statements relative to specific positive feedback statements (p < .06), and recalled more total information about negative feedback dimensions compared to positive feedback dimensions (p < .05). The superior recall for negative feedback may be explained by two theories. The first is a modified version of competence motivation. Recalling negative information may help the individual master his/her environment because negative feedback indicates which behaviors were performed below standard, and need to be changed. Self-enhancement theory may also explain these results. Individuals may have attempted to refute the validity of the negative feedback, and this lead to greater processing of and enhanced recall for this information. Memory sensitivity data did not support any of the theories. Ratings of feedback accuracy supported previous literature and showed clear support for self.enhancement theory. Individuals rated positive feedback as more accurate than negative feedback, but only when the feedback dimensions were important or had high diagnostic value.en
dc.description.degreePh. D.en
dc.format.extentviii, 186 leavesen
dc.format.mediumBTDen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.otheretd-08232007-111919en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-08232007-111919/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/39194en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartLD5655.V856_1990.D665.pdfen
dc.relation.isformatofOCLC# 22335882en
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subject.lccLD5655.V856 1990.D665en
dc.subject.lcshFeedback (Psychology)en
dc.subject.lcshMemoryen
dc.subject.lcshMotivation (Psychology)en
dc.subject.lcshPerformanceen
dc.titleMemory for performance feedback: a test of three self- motivation theoriesen
dc.typeDissertationen
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
thesis.degree.disciplinePsychologyen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.namePh. D.en

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LD5655.V856_1990.D665.pdf
Size:
5.34 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Doctoral Dissertations