Analysis of Current BIM Execution Plans and Contract Documents to Support Automation of Clash Resolution

dc.contributor.authorHarode, Ashiten
dc.contributor.authorMills, Thomasen
dc.contributor.authorThabet, Waliden
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-05T13:34:57Zen
dc.date.available2025-03-05T13:34:57Zen
dc.date.issued2023-04-04en
dc.description.abstractStep one of MEP coordination process identifies the clash between MEP elements followed by step two identifying their potential resolution. Clash identification has been automated using software like Navisworks yet clash resolution remains a slow and manual process. Use of Machine Learning has been explored by researchers to automate clash resolution. These researches utilize graphical information and attributes embedded into Building Information Model (BIM) elements to develop a Machine Learning model making BIMs an integral part of the automation. The literature review shows that the successful implementation of BIMs is supported by well-executed BIM Execution Plans (BxP) and Standards. Therefore, it can be said that a successful implementation of clash resolution automation will require the support of these documents. To assess the readiness of BxP to support the automation of clash resolution, the authors in this paper reviewed three BxP and Standard guides. A comparative analysis of three industry standard BxP and Standard guides was conducted to reveal the topic covered by them. Results from the review show that the BxPs and Standards are lacking to support the automation of clash resolution. Suggested potential changes to make these documents ready for the implementation of automation of clash resolution are discussed.en
dc.description.notesYes, full paper (Peer reviewed?)en
dc.description.versionAccepted versionen
dc.format.extentPages 271-261en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.29007/6s1ten
dc.identifier.issn2632-881Xen
dc.identifier.orcidMills, Thomas [0000-0002-6059-2824]en
dc.identifier.orcidThabet, Walid [0000-0001-8832-5317]en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/124794en
dc.identifier.volume4en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherEasyChairen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectBIM Execution Planen
dc.subjectBIM Standardsen
dc.subjectAutomated Clash Resolutionen
dc.subjectMachine Learningen
dc.subjectAmendmentsen
dc.titleAnalysis of Current BIM Execution Plans and Contract Documents to Support Automation of Clash Resolutionen
dc.title.serialProceedings of 56th Annual Associated Schools of Construction (ASC) International Conferenceen
dc.typeConference proceedingen
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
pubs.finish-date2023-04-05en
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Techen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/Engineeringen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/All T&R Facultyen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/Engineering/COE T&R Facultyen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/Engineering/Myers-Lawson School of Constructionen
pubs.start-date2023-04-03en

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
ASC2023_Recommendation and Ammendment_Second Submission_Final Version.docx
Size:
56.03 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word XML
Description:
Accepted version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.5 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: