VTechWorks staff will be away for the Independence Day holiday from July 4-7. We will respond to email inquiries on Monday, July 8. Thank you for your patience.
 

The DoCTRINE Guidelines: Defined Criteria To Report INnovations in Education

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBlanco, Mariaen
dc.contributor.authorPrunuske, Jacoben
dc.contributor.authorDiCorcia, Marken
dc.contributor.authorLearman, Lee A.en
dc.contributor.authorMutcheson, Brocken
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Grace C.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-03T16:42:13Zen
dc.date.available2023-04-03T16:42:13Zen
dc.date.issued2022-05-01en
dc.date.updated2023-03-31T16:35:08Zen
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Reporting guidelines assist authors in conducting and describing their research in alignment with evidence-based and expert-determined standards. However, published research-oriented guidelines do not capture all of the components that must be present in descriptions of educational innovations in health professions education. The authors aimed to create guidelines for educational innovations in curriculum development that would be easy for early-career educators to use, support reporting necessary details, and promote educational scholarship. Method: Beginning in 2017, the authors systematically developed a reporting checklist for educational innovations in curriculum development, called Defined Criteria To Report INnovations in Education (DoCTRINE), and collected validity evidence for its use according to the 4 inferences of Kane's framework. They derived the items using a modified Delphi method, followed by pilot testing, cognitive interviewing, and interrater reliability testing. In May-November 2019, they implemented DoCTRINE for authors submitting to MedEdPORTAL, half of whom were randomized to receive the checklist (intervention group). The authors scored manuscripts using DoCTRINE while blinded to group assignment, and they collected data on final editorial decisions. Results: The final DoCTRINE checklist consists of 19 items, categorized into 5 components: introduction, curriculum development, curriculum implementation, results, and discussion. The overall interrater agreement was 0.91. Among the 108 manuscripts submitted to MedEdPORTAL during the study period, the mean (SD) total score was higher for accepted than rejected submissions (16.9 [1.73] vs 15.7 [2.24], P =.006). There were no significant differences in DoCTRINE scores between the intervention group, who received the checklist, and the control group, who did not. Conclusions: The authors developed DoCTRINE, using systematic approaches, for the scholarly reporting of educational innovations in curriculum development. This checklist may be a useful tool for supporting the publishing efforts of early-career faculty.en
dc.description.versionAccepted versionen
dc.format.extentPages 689-695en
dc.format.extent7 page(s)en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004634en
dc.identifier.eissn1938-808Xen
dc.identifier.issn1040-2446en
dc.identifier.issue5en
dc.identifier.orcidLearman, Lee [0000-0001-8698-8918]en
dc.identifier.other00001888-202205000-00027 (PII)en
dc.identifier.pmid35171122en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/114240en
dc.identifier.volume97en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen
dc.relation.urihttp://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000787893800027&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=930d57c9ac61a043676db62af60056c1en
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectHEALTH-PROFESSIONS EDUCATIONen
dc.subjectSCHOLARSHIPen
dc.subjectQUALITYen
dc.subject.meshHumansen
dc.subject.meshReproducibility of Resultsen
dc.subject.meshFellowships and Scholarshipsen
dc.subject.meshCurriculumen
dc.subject.meshChecklisten
dc.subject.meshResearch Reporten
dc.titleThe DoCTRINE Guidelines: Defined Criteria To Report INnovations in Educationen
dc.title.serialAcademic Medicineen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
dc.type.otherArticleen
dc.type.otherJournalen
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Techen
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech/Faculty of Health Sciencesen
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech/All T&R Facultyen
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech/VT Carilion School of Medicineen
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech/VT Carilion School of Medicine/Dean of VTC School of Medicineen
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech/VT Carilion School of Medicine/VTC School of Medicine - Instr Pgmsen
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech/VT Carilion School of Medicine/TEACH Membersen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
The DoCTRINE Guidelines.pdf
Size:
832.07 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted version
Download

Collections

All Faculty Deposits
Scholarly Works, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine (VTCSOM)