Focused Ultrasound Methods for the treatment of Tendon Injuries

Tendon injuries are prevalent, debilitating and difficult to treat. Common interventions such as anti-inflammatory medication, growth factor injections and surgery are associated with short-term efficacy and long rehabilitation periods. Tendons possess an incomplete healing response which is reparative (scar-mediated) rather than regenerative, resulting in a 'healed' tissue that is mechanically inferior to the native tendon. While it is widely accepted that mechanical-loading based treatments offer long-term symptomatic resolution and improved functionality, the exact mechanisms of action of such mechanotransduction-based healing cascades remain unclear. Nevertheless, there is significant motivation for the development of non-invasive and efficient rehabilitative treatments that mechanically stimulate the injured tendons to achieve functional healing responses. Focused Ultrasound (FUS) methods are an attractive treatment option as they are non-invasive, utilize higher intensities for shorter durations and are targeted to a very specific treatment volume, hence inducing significant bio-effects in the tissue without affecting surrounding structures. Herein, we present a body of work that includes the development of FUS pulsing to precisely target murine Achilles tendons and emphasize distinct bioeffects (thermal-dominant and mechanical-dominant).

We investigated the feasibility of applying FUS pulsing to murine Achilles tendons ex vivo and in vivo and demonstrated that FUS can be safely applied without any deleterious effects in the tendons and surrounding tissues. The animals showed no symptoms of distress after multi-session treatments. Overall, results suggest that tendon material properties are not adversely altered by FUS pulsing. Histological analyses showed mild matrix disorganization, suggesting the need for slight modifications in the ultrasound pulsing parameters and treatment durations. When applied to injured tendons, mechanical dominant schemes seemed to drive larger improvements in material properties compared to thermal-dominant pulsing, confirming our original hypothesis that mechanical stimulation may play a bigger role in tendon healing compared to purely thermal-dominant stimulation. Additionally, feasibility of histotripsy ablation in murine Achilles tendons was successfully investigated ex vivo and in vivo and experimentation to further optimize these methods are ongoing. Such (non-thermal) ablative paradigms will be extremely useful when conservative treatment options are unavailable and debridement of scar tissue is warranted to interrupt the degenerative process and stimulate healing. Finally, a pilot investigation into FUS-induced strains was performed to guide our parameter selection process and deliver controlled strains to achieve healing responses (similar to current clinical rehabilitation protocols). We were able confirm that strains between 1% and 6% (or higher) can be induced by manipulating ultrasound treatment parameters. Overall, or results reiterate the potential of FUS in eliciting the desired bioeffects and thus achieve healing in tendons and provide a snapshot of the expected effects of using such pulsing methods to treat tendon injuries.