A Hive Mind: Bounded Rationality and Bees

dc.contributor.authorOstrom, Robert Benjamin Joelen
dc.contributor.committeechairSchuerch, Rogeren
dc.contributor.committeememberWilson, James McKeeen
dc.contributor.committeememberHult, Karen M.en
dc.contributor.committeememberCouvillon, Margaret Janeen
dc.contributor.committeememberRice, Kevin B.en
dc.contributor.departmentEntomologyen
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-16T09:00:47Zen
dc.date.available2025-01-16T09:00:47Zen
dc.date.issued2025-01-15en
dc.description.abstractBees (Anthophila) are experiencing global decline as part of what is being called the Anthropocene extinction. In addition to the drivers of this event, such as climate change, bees are experiencing synergistic challenges from pesticides, poor nutrition, pathogens, and parasites. Bees play a crucial role in our world because they help to pollinate flowers, allowing plants in both agricultural and ecological settings to reproduce, and our reliance on them is projected to increase, even as their numbers decline. Therefore, there is a critical need to identify and understand how the behavior of bees, and human behavior towards bees, function under settings of imperfect information, where we act as boundedly rational actors. Therefore, in our studies, we focus on the impacts of changing landscapes on bees – whether those are environmental or political. In our investigations, we utilized bees, measuring their behaviors and community health, in multiple contexts to evaluate the interface of the human - bee world. In Chapter 2, we investigated the impact of human land use changes on honey bee foraging dynamics. We decoded, mapped, and analyzed the waggle dances of hives in Blacksburg, Virginia before (2018-19) and after (2022) the conversion of some of their prime habitat through construction. We found that bees increased their foraging nearly four-fold on the microhabitat which were untouched by the construction, but they are forced to nearly double their average foraging distance (0.69 to 1.28km) after the land development. In Chapter 3, we deployed dancing honey bees as potential predictors for native bee abundance and diversity. We used an existing dataset of decoded honey bee waggle dances (n = 11,050 from 2018-2019) to map three Virginian locations (Blacksburg, Winchester, and Suffolk) and the places preferred and avoided by bees within. Then we sampled (2021-2022) at 10 sites within each location using hand nets, bee bowls, and blue vane traps to determine the relationship between honey bee predicted landscapes and native bee abundance and diversity. We found a parabolic relationship between honey bee foraging and native bee abundance (p < 0.001), a relationship that remains robust when we stratify our capture by family (Apidae and non-Apidae) or sociality (solitary and social). In Chapter 4, we quantified bee community health metrics (abundance, richness, and diversity) in soybean plots in Columbia, Missouri, which were either treated with grower standard pyrethroid spray or attract-and-kill insecticidal netting treatments for the control of Japanese Beetle. These bee community health metrics were based on 1473 captured bees. We found a significant decrease in bee abundance in attract-and kill-plots compared to grower standard plots for all application periods (p < 0.002), a trend driven solely by the most common species, Melissodes bimaculatus. In Chapter 5, we directly examined human behavior concerning bees by analyzing the location, policy subsystem, and partisan control in which recent state level bee statutes were passed in the United States, following the 2022 midterm elections. We report on a robustly significant relationship between partisan control over states and the category of bee legislation enacted (p = 0.004). Our spatial analysis revealed a contiguous bloc of central states, along the Mississippi-Missouri Rivers, which did not enact bee legislation. We speculate this may be because soybean, a self-pollinating crop, is one of their largest agricultural exports. Finally, we conclude this thesis with a brief discussion of how these chapters have advanced our understanding of how bees react to human modified landscapes, and how human assumptions about bees shape our behaviors, from the level of individual farms to entire regions of the country.en
dc.description.abstractgeneralInsects, and thus bees, are experiencing widespread population decline. In addition to the global factors like climate change, bees face increased pressure from pesticides, poor nutrition, pathogens, and parasites. Bees play a crucial role in our world because they help to pollinate flowers, allowing plants in both farms and our backyards to reproduce. Our reliance on bees is set to increase, even as their numbers continue to decline. As we continue to lose time and press into unchartered territory, there is a critical need to identify and understand how the behavior of bees, and human behavior towards bees, functions under settings of imperfect information. Therefore, in our studies, we focus on the impacts of changing landscapes on bees – whether those are environmental or political. In our investigations, we measure their behaviors and community health of bees in multiple ways to explore their interactions with people. In Chapter 2, we investigated the impact of land use changes on honey bee food gathering behavior. We mapped and analyzed where bees went to feed in Blacksburg, Virginia before (2018-19) and after (2022) construction appeared in their habitat. We found that bees feed nearly four times as much on what little habitat remained, but the bees are also forced to nearly double the distance flown per foraging flight, after construction removed habitat. In Chapter 3, we used honey bee communication as potential predictors for native bee community health. We used an existing dataset of information on where bees went to gather food from 2018-2019 to map three Virginian locations (Blacksburg, Winchester, and Suffolk) and the places preferred and avoided by bees within. Then we sampled (2021-2022) at 10 sites within each location using hand nets, bee bowls, and blue vane traps to determine the relationship between where honey bees gathered resources, and the number of native bee individuals and species found. We found honey bee foraging predicted for the numbers of native bees found, a relationship which stayed strong regardless of how closely native bees were related to honey bees, and whether they lived in hives or not. In Chapter 4, we measured bee community health in soybean plots in Columbia, Missouri, which either used pesticide spray or chemically treated netting treatments to control Japanese Beetle. We found the number of native bees decreased in plots that used the netting, before during and after the other plots were sprayed with pesticides. This trend was driven by the most common bee, Melissodes bimaculatus. In Chapter 5, we explored human behavior on bees by analyzing the location, content, and political party control in which state level bee laws were passed in the U.S., following the 2022 midterm elections. We report that party control over states has a large influence on the type of bee laws enacted. When we mapped the states that passed bee laws, we saw a group of central states along the Mississippi-Missouri Rivers did not pass any. This may be because soybean, a crop that doesn't need bees to pollinate, is one of their largest agricultural exports. Finally, we conclude this thesis with a brief discussion of how these chapters have advanced our understanding of how bees react to human modified landscapes, and how human assumptions about bees shape our behaviors, from the level of individual farms to entire regions of the country.en
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophyen
dc.format.mediumETDen
dc.identifier.othervt_gsexam:42253en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/124217en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjecthabitat disturbanceen
dc.subjectpopulation surveyen
dc.subjectsoybeanen
dc.subjectstate policyen
dc.subjectwaggle danceen
dc.titleA Hive Mind: Bounded Rationality and Beesen
dc.typeDissertationen
thesis.degree.disciplineEntomologyen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ostrom_RB_D_2025.pdf
Size:
1.72 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format