How does IPM 3.0 look like (and why do we need it in Africa)?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorTamo, Manueleen
dc.contributor.authorGlitho, Isabelleen
dc.contributor.authorTepa-Yotto, Ghislainen
dc.contributor.authorMuniappan, Rangaswamyen
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-09T17:53:14Zen
dc.date.available2023-05-09T17:53:14Zen
dc.date.issued2022-10en
dc.description.abstractThe concept of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) was introduced sixty years ago to curb the overuse of agricultural pesticides, whereby its simplest version (IPM 1.0) was aiming at reducing the frequency of applications. Gradually, agro-ecological principles, such as biological control and habitat management, were included in IPM 2.0. However, throughout this time, smallholder farmers did not improve their decision -making skills and continue to use hazardous pesticides as their first control option. We are therefore proposing a new paradigm - IPM 3.0 - anchored on 3 pillars: 1) real-time farmer access to decision-making, 2) pest-management options relying on science-driven and nature-based approaches, and 3) the integration of genomic approaches, biopesticides, and habitat -management practices. We are convinced that this new paradigm based on technological advances, involvement of youth, gender-responsiveness, and climate resilience will be a game changer. However, this can only become effective through redeployment of public funding and stronger policy support.en
dc.description.notesThis work was funded in part by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under Agreement No. 7200AA18LE00003 as part of Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Legume Systems Research. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed here are those of the authors alone. MT and GTY were also supported by funding received from the International Development Association (IDA) of the World Bank through the project Accelerating Impacts of CGIAR Climate Research for Africa (AICCRA, P173398) . The authors are grateful to Armel D. Hounmenou for providing the illustrations, and to Peter Neuenschwander for critical comments on the paper.en
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States Agency for International Development (USAID) [7200AA18LE00003]; International Development Association (IDA) of the World Bank through the project Accelerating Impacts of CGIAR Climate Research for Africa [P173398]en
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2022.100961en
dc.identifier.eissn2214-5753en
dc.identifier.other100961en
dc.identifier.pmid35961493en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/114995en
dc.identifier.volume53en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectIntegrated pest-managementen
dc.subjectpush-pull technologyen
dc.subjectspodoptera-frugiperdaen
dc.subjectplutella-xylostellaen
dc.subjectdiamondback mothen
dc.subjectfarming systemsen
dc.subjectmaruca-vitrataen
dc.subjectfall armywormen
dc.subjectlepidopteraen
dc.subjectfooden
dc.titleHow does IPM 3.0 look like (and why do we need it in Africa)?en
dc.title.serialCurrent Opinion in Insect Scienceen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S2214574522000967-main.pdf
Size:
2.02 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
Download

Collections

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Innovation Lab (CIRED)