Practical Considerations When Using Predictive Models Within Optimization Problems: Issues, Options, and Applications
| dc.contributor.author | Lanham, Matthew Aaron | en |
| dc.contributor.committeechair | Abrahams, Alan Samuel | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Zobel, Christopher W. | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Ragsdale, Cliff T. | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Seref, Onur | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Wang, Alan Gang | en |
| dc.contributor.department | Business, Business Information Technology | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-14T08:00:17Z | en |
| dc.date.available | 2025-08-14T08:00:17Z | en |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-08-13 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | This research highlights important practical considerations when incorporating predictive models within prescriptive optimization models. We provide a scholarly research stream and suggest industry best practices by identifying novel modeling considerations that can reduce decision support risk. Specifically, we provide a practical two-stage predictive to prescriptive decision support modeling framework where the analyst creates a model for predicting some quantity in the first stage, then optimizes some business performance measure in the second stage using the estimated predictive model from the first stage. We propose and demonstrate novel methods to detect and account for data regions in the decision model formulation where the predictive model is not supported (or is weakly supported) by the data, unwittingly leading to more risky business decisions. We provide examples where the predictive model features are numeric, which are most common in prediction-type problems, as well as optimization problems where decision variables are real-numbered variables. We posit that current practices integrating a predictive model into a prescriptive model solution are potentially leading to risky decision recommendations. We provide an example from carpet manufacturing focused on achieving a specified quality level along with financial cost considerations. In this real-world case, the prediction problem contains features that are controllable decisions in the decision model. We demonstrate how the modeler could effectively consider decisions that fall "inside the box" of historical data. Subsequently, we provide a novel approach to identify and assess solutions "outside the box" of historical solutions, which might occur from a new process, product, or situation where the decision maker wants to take risker decisions for the chance of a potentially greater outcome. Next, we demonstrate how the decision maker may want to "push the envelope" to solutions that exceed the historical observations in a structured fashion. Lastly, we summarize our findings and identify new avenues for research when predictive models are integrated within optimization models. | en |
| dc.description.abstractgeneral | In today's business world, decision making is often highly complex. New technologies and markets can emerge quickly. Practitioners are often tasked to capture data about their products, customers, and processes and find useful trends and insights from the data to improve how the business is managed. There are three common tasks these practitioners do. First, they describe or report what they are observing from the data. Next, they can use the data to predict what might happen in the future. This requires creating a mathematical tool that ingests today's data to make predictions. If the company can predict the future somewhat accurately, they can then try to create a secondary mathematical tool that helps support the best action or decision they should make. This dissertation investigates key steps and considerations the business person should consider when joining the prediction tool with the secondary decision recommendation tool. I demonstrate issues that can occur, and probably do occur, because datasets used in business are often very large and complex. I use a real-world carpet manufacturing data set that can be visually inspected, and demonstrate where issues arise, and how to mitigate those based on the business context. I provide "inside the box" decision suggestions, which are those in proximity of the data points previously observed. A common example might be a business process that has most of the "kinks" and "bugs" worked out, but is still not leading to the best possible outcome for the business. Next, I provide "outside the box" decisions suggestions where the decision maker can expect to extrapolate beyond the data they observed in the past, and might be for a new process or new product, where the previous data might not be as relevant or trustworthy. Lastly, I "push the envelope" with business suggestions that find sort of a middle ground between inside the box and outside the box suggestions. This research could lead to improving industry best practices that reduce unintended consequences and lead to better business outcomes across many industries. | en |
| dc.description.degree | Doctor of Philosophy | en |
| dc.format.medium | ETD | en |
| dc.identifier.other | vt_gsexam:44438 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10919/137495 | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Virginia Tech | en |
| dc.rights | In Copyright | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | en |
| dc.subject | Predictive Analytics | en |
| dc.subject | Prescriptive Analytics | en |
| dc.subject | Decision Support | en |
| dc.title | Practical Considerations When Using Predictive Models Within Optimization Problems: Issues, Options, and Applications | en |
| dc.type | Dissertation | en |
| thesis.degree.discipline | Business, Business Information Technology | en |
| thesis.degree.grantor | Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University | en |
| thesis.degree.level | doctoral | en |
| thesis.degree.name | Doctor of Philosophy | en |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1