Managing Poultry Gut Integrity, Immunity and Microbial Balance During Necrotic Enteritis

Abstract

Necrotic enteritis (NE) is a major enteric disease in commercial poultry and manifests itself in clinical and subclinical forms. Despite years of research, NE is still among the leading diseases with the greatest economic impact on poultry production. Subclinical forms lead to poor performance (reduced feed intake, weight gain and eventually higher feed conversion ratio) but usually occurs with low mortality rates. The use of antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) is proving to be an effective tool in maintaining gut health and modifying gut microbiota, thus improving broiler performance and reducing NE. Removal of AGPs has led to an increase in NE occurrence, particularly the subclinical forms. The lack of alternative strategies to control NE is mainly due to limited insight into the relationship between NE pathogenesis, the host microbiome and its immune responses. Therefore, key to overcoming NE is to define the cellular and molecular mechanisms that are involved in the progression of the disease, especially with regard to mucosal immune responses and gut microbiome. Also, assessing the impact of these changes on gut cell metabolism and function is of great importance. This information would be a valuable guide to prevent the onset or alleviate the negative impact of NE on bird's health and performance. In a series of experiments conducted for this project, the effect of single or multi-strain probiotics as well as multi-component additives were tested during NE challenge in order to define the cellular and molecular mechanisms that are involved in the progression of the disease. Results of these experiments revealed that challenging broilers with a 'naturally occurring' NE led to differential expression of tight junction (TJ) proteins in the jejunum compared to non-challenged birds. Supplementation of certain additives reduced NE lesion scores, improved performance and increased mRNA abundance of claudin-3, a key epithelial TJ protein. Multi-strain probiotics and multi-component additives (including a symbiotic and a product containing probiotics, prebiotics and essential oils) were more effective than single-strain probiotics or prebiotics. The aforementioned additives were also more effective in modulating immune responses to NE, especially by decreasing the mRNA abundance of IFN-γ and IL-10 in the jejunum. Furthermore, supplementation of these additives led to an increase in the expression of nutrient transporters (SGLT-1) and regulators of energy metabolism (PGC-1α, mTOR and AMPK); thus, improving nutrients absorption and metabolism. Microbial profiling using 16S rRNA sequencing showed that supplementation of each specific additive led to a signature-like microbiome in the ileal scrapings of broilers. However, supplementation of multi-component additives (including a symbiotic and a product containing probiotics, prebiotics and essential oils) modified the ileal microbiome in association with lower NE lesion scores, better performance and modulated immune responses. These additives reduced the relative abundance of bacteria such as ASF356, Bacteroides, Clostridium sensu stricto 1, Faecalibaculum, Lachnospiraceae UCG-001, Muribaculum, Oscillibacter, Parabacteroides, Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group, Ruminococcaceae UCG-014, and Ruminiclostridium 9 and increased the relative abundance of Lactobacillus compared to NE challenged birds. Collectively, these data indicate that during a subclinical naturally occurring NE, the use of multi-strain probiotics or multi-component additives, compared to single-strain probiotics or prebiotics, would be a more promising strategy in alleviating the effect of this enteric disease.