A comparison of 3-D spherical shell thermal convection results at low to moderate Rayleigh number using ASPECT (version 2.2.0) and CitcomS (version 3.3.1)

dc.contributor.authorEuen, Grant T.en
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Shangxinen
dc.contributor.authorGassmoller, Reneen
dc.contributor.authorHeister, Timoen
dc.contributor.authorKing, Scott D.en
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-22T14:27:48Zen
dc.date.available2024-01-22T14:27:48Zen
dc.date.issued2023-06-09en
dc.description.abstractDue to the increasing availability of high-performance computing over the past few decades, numerical models have become an important tool for research in geodynamics. Several generations of mantle convection software have been developed, but due to their differing methods and increasing complexity it is important to evaluate the accuracy of each new model generation to ensure published geodynamic research is reliable and reproducible. Here we explore the accuracy of the open-source, finite-element codes ASPECT and CitcomS as a function of mesh spacing using low to moderate-Rayleigh-number models in steady-state thermal convection. ASPECT (Advanced Solver for Problems in Earth's ConvecTion) is a new-generation mantle convection code that enables modeling global mantle convection with realistic parameters and complicated physical processes using adaptive mesh refinement . We compare the ASPECT results with calculations from the finite-element code CitcomS , which has a long history of use in the geodynamics community. We find that the globally averaged quantities, i.e., root-mean-square (rms) velocity, mean temperature, and Nusselt number at the top and bottom of the shell, agree to within 1% (and often much better) for calculations with sufficient mesh resolution. We also show that there is excellent agreement of the time evolution of both the rms velocity and the Nusselt numbers between the two codes for otherwise identical parameters. Based on our results, we are optimistic that similar agreement would be achieved for calculations performed at the convective vigor expected for Earth, Venus, and Mars.en
dc.description.versionAccepted versionen
dc.format.extentPages 3221-3239en
dc.format.extent19 page(s)en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3221-2023en
dc.identifier.eissn1991-9603en
dc.identifier.issn1991-959Xen
dc.identifier.issue11en
dc.identifier.orcidKing, Scott [0000-0002-9564-5164]en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/117509en
dc.identifier.volume16en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCopernicusen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.titleA comparison of 3-D spherical shell thermal convection results at low to moderate Rayleigh number using ASPECT (version 2.2.0) and CitcomS (version 3.3.1)en
dc.title.serialGeoscientific Model Developmenten
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
dc.type.otherArticleen
dc.type.otherJournalen
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Techen
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech/Scienceen
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech/Science/Geosciencesen
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech/All T&R Facultyen
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech/Science/COS T&R Facultyen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
gmd-2022-252-typeset_manuscript-version2.pdf
Size:
3.3 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.5 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: