Fall harvest management of alfalfa

Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) harvest schedules are often interrupted by rainfall, unfavorable environmental conditions for growth, and unfavorable weather for hay curing. Interruptions in alfalfa harvest schedules can delay the final harvest until dates considered critical to winter survival. Harvests made between 20 September and 30 October are considered detrimental to the persistence of alfalfa stands in geographical areas such as western Virginia. The objectives of this study were to determine if a critical period for fall harvest management actually exists in Virginia, if length of the growth period prior to fall harvest (GPPFH) influences plant persistence and succeeding spring yields, and if photosynthesis offsets respiration and allows more flexible fall harvest management than is currently recommended.

Final alfalfa harvests were made 10, 20, or 30 September or 10, 20, or 30 October for 2 years in two identical experiments. Alfalfa was managed to achieve 30, 40, 50, or 60 days of growth prior to each fall harvest date. Total nonstructural carbohydrates (TNC) in tap roots and population of surviving plants were determined in December and March. Succeeding spring yields were measured in May. Zero, 45, and 60 percent shade were imposed following four fall harvest dates in a supplemental study to investigate the influence of photosynthesis on TNC levels and plant persistence. In the supplemental study, CO₂ exchange and TNC were measured at 2 week intervals in the fall following four fall harvest dates.

Harvests made during the fall period previously considered as critical did not cause over-wintering plant losses. Length of growth period prior to fall harvests was more important than date of fall harvest in making management decisions for fall harvest. Although spring yield generally increased with length of GPPFH, the spring growth appeared healthy; so one might expect a few days of delay prior to the first spring harvest to eliminate any detrimental influence of short length of GPPFH. Succeeding spring yields and TNC levels were generally high for the 50-day GPPFH, and fall harvest yield offset any reductions in spring yield observed in this study. In addition, fall harvests made with a 50-day GPPFH maintained quality and leafiness as opposed to a 60-day GPPFH.

Fall regrowth and plant maintenance were not dependent on root TNC accumulation. Photosynthesis offset TNC losses for regrowth and maintenance during the fall. High photosynthetic rates as compared to respiration occurred because temperatures were within the optimum range for photosynthesis of alfalfa during 68% of the daylight hours from September through November.

There was no critical period for fall harvest management with the environmental conditions experienced during this study. A 50 or 60-day GPPFH prior to fall harvest was adequate for plant persistence and high succeeding spring yields.