Public transport and the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative analysis of trends and policies in Great Britain, Germany, the USA, Canada, and Australia

dc.contributor.authorBuehler, Ralphen
dc.contributor.authorPucher, Johnen
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Peteren
dc.contributor.authorCurrie, Grahamen
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-04T13:32:59Zen
dc.date.available2026-03-04T13:32:59Zen
dc.date.issued2025-09en
dc.description.abstractThis paper compares changes in urban public transport (PT) demand and supply before, during, and after COVID-19 in Great Britain, Germany, the USA, Canada, and Australia. We also examine a range of PT system measures and government policies implemented during and since the pandemic to improve safety, adjust service levels, and encourage ridership. Ridership fell sharply in 2020 and 2021, when COVID-19 rates were highest. As a percentage of 2019 levels, the lowest annual ridership for each country was 31% for Great Britain, 42% for Canada, 46% for the USA, 48% for Australia, and 64% in Germany. The latest full year of available data (2024) indicates that Germany (94%), Great Britain (90%), and Australia (90%) recovered the highest percentages of 2019 ridership levels, compared to 83% in Canada and 77% in the USA. Bus ridership declined less than rail ridership and recovered more fully, especially in the USA, Canada, and Australia. Our analysis of PT in five large cities finds that recovery rates were generally higher on weekends than on weekdays, both for bus and rail. The most important government policy for PT has been a massive increase in funding, especially from central governments, to offset the large operating budget deficits resulting from lost passenger revenue. That funding enabled PT systems to maintain or reduce fares while avoiding large reductions in supply. Dependable government support will be necessary in the coming years to make PT financially sustainable and to enable long-term planning for infrastructure modernization and improved service.en
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
dc.format.extent22 page(s)en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifierARTN 104549 (Article number)en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104549en
dc.identifier.eissn1879-2375en
dc.identifier.issn0965-8564en
dc.identifier.orcidBuehler, Ralph [0000-0002-1254-2224]en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/141655en
dc.identifier.volume199en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherPergamon-Elsevieren
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectPublic transporten
dc.subjectTransiten
dc.subjectCOVID-19en
dc.subjectRidershipen
dc.subjectInternational comparisonen
dc.subjectUrban transport policyen
dc.titlePublic transport and the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative analysis of trends and policies in Great Britain, Germany, the USA, Canada, and Australiaen
dc.title.serialTransportation Research Part Aen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
dc.type.otherArticleen
dc.type.otherJournalen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Techen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/All T&R Facultyen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/Liberal Arts and Human Sciencesen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/Liberal Arts and Human Sciences/CLAHS T&R Facultyen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/Liberal Arts and Human Sciences/School of Public and International Affairsen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S0965856425001776-main.pdf
Size:
6.08 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.5 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: