Integral aerodynamic-structural-control wing design

dc.contributor.authorRais-Rohani, Masouden
dc.contributor.committeechairHaftka, Raphael T.en
dc.contributor.committeememberGrossman, Bernarden
dc.contributor.committeememberJohnson, Eric R.en
dc.contributor.committeememberLutze, Frederick H.en
dc.contributor.committeememberKapania, Rakesh K.en
dc.contributor.departmentAerospace Engineeringen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T21:21:13Zen
dc.date.adate2005-10-14en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T21:21:13Zen
dc.date.issued1991en
dc.date.rdate2005-10-14en
dc.date.sdate2005-10-14en
dc.description.abstractThe aerodynamic-structural-control design of a simplified wing and a forward-swept composite wing are studied. In the first example, the wing is modeled as a beam with a control surface near the wing tip. The torsional stiffness is the only physical property varying along the span. The aerodynamic model is based on strip theory, and the control model is based on output feed-back control. With the structural-control interaction being the main focus, two different approaches are taken for the simplified wing design: (1) a sequential approach, (2) an integrated approach. In each approach the wing is designed for minimum weight subject to divergence and control deflection constraints. The results of this study indicated that while the integrated approach produced a better design than the sequential approach, the difference was minimal. In the second example, a forward-swept composite wing is designed for a high subsonic transport aircraft. The structural analysis is based on finite-element method. The aerodynamic calculations are based on vortex-lattice method, and the control calculations are based on output feed-back control. The wing is designed for minimum weight subject to structural, aerodynamic/performance and control constraints. Efficient methods are used to calculate the control deflection and efficiency sensitivities which appear as second order derivatives in the control constraint equations. To suppress the aeroelastic divergence of the forward-swept wing, and to reduce the gross weight of the design aircraft, two separate cases are studied: (1) combined application of aeroelastic tailoring and active controls, (2) aeroelastic tailoring alone. The results of this study indicated that, for this particular example, aeroelastic tailoring is sufficient for suppressing the aeroelastic divergence, and the use of active controls was not necessary.en
dc.description.degreePh. D.en
dc.format.extentx, 126 leavesen
dc.format.mediumBTDen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.otheretd-10142005-103059en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-10142005-103059/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/39867en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartLD5655.V856_1991.R358.pdfen
dc.relation.isformatofOCLC# 24706990en
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subject.lccLD5655.V856 1991.R358en
dc.subject.lcshAirplanes -- Wingsen
dc.titleIntegral aerodynamic-structural-control wing designen
dc.typeDissertationen
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
thesis.degree.disciplineAerospace Engineeringen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.namePh. D.en

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LD5655.V856_1991.R358.pdf
Size:
5.92 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: