Carnivore space use behaviors reveal variation in responses to human land modification
| dc.contributor.author | Gorman, Nicole T. | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Eichholz, Michael W. | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Skinner, Daniel J. | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Schlichting, Peter E. | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Bastille-Rousseau, Guillaume | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-29T12:15:32Z | en |
| dc.date.available | 2024-07-29T12:15:32Z | en |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-07-18 | en |
| dc.date.updated | 2024-07-21T03:13:10Z | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Spatial behavior, including home-ranging behaviors, habitat selection, and movement, can be extremely informative in estimating how animals respond to landscape heterogeneity. Responses in these spatial behaviors to features such as human land modification and resources can highlight a species’ spatial strategy to maximize fitness and minimize mortality. These strategies can vary on spatial, temporal, and individual scales, and the combination of behaviors on these scales can lead to very different strategies among species. Methods: Harnessing the variation present at these scales, we characterized how species may respond to stimuli in their environments ranging from broad- to fine-scale spatial responses to human modification in their environment. Using 15 bobcat-years and 31 coyote-years of GPS data from individuals inhabiting a landscape encompassing a range of human land modification, we evaluated the complexity of both species’ responses to human modification on the landscape through their home range size, habitat selection, and functional response behaviors, accounting for annual, seasonal, and diel variation. Results: Bobcats and coyotes used different strategies in response to human modification in their home ranges, with bobcats broadly expanding their home range with increases in human modification and displaying temporal consistency in functional response in habitat selection across both season and time of day. Meanwhile, coyotes did not expand their home ranges with increased human modification, but instead demonstrated fine-scale responses to human modification with habitat selection strategies that sometimes varied by time of day and season, paired with functional responses in selection behaviors. Conclusions: These differences in response to habitat, resources, and human modification between the two species highlighted the variation in spatial behaviors animals can use to exist in anthropogenic environments. Categorizing animal spatial behavior based on these spatiotemporal responses and individual variation can help in predicting how a species will respond to future change based on their current spatial behavior. | en |
| dc.description.version | Published version | en |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | Movement Ecology. 2024 Jul 18;12(1):51 | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-024-00493-7 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10919/120721 | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International | en |
| dc.rights.holder | The Author(s) | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en |
| dc.title | Carnivore space use behaviors reveal variation in responses to human land modification | en |
| dc.title.serial | Movement Ecology | en |
| dc.type | Article - Refereed | en |
| dc.type.dcmitype | Text | en |