Estimating Changes in Residential Water Demand for Voluntary and Mandatory Water-Use Restrictions Implemented during the 2002 Virginia Drought

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorHalich, Gregory Stewarten
dc.contributor.committeechairStephenson, Stephen Kurten
dc.contributor.committeememberCox, William E.en
dc.contributor.committeememberRadtke, Philip J.en
dc.contributor.committeememberFox, Thomas R.en
dc.contributor.committeememberTaylor, Daniel B.en
dc.contributor.committeememberHilmer, Christiana E.en
dc.contributor.committeememberBosch, Darrell J.en
dc.contributor.departmentAgricultural and Applied Economicsen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T20:14:37Zen
dc.date.adate2005-09-14en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T20:14:37Zen
dc.date.issued2005-06-27en
dc.date.rdate2007-09-14en
dc.date.sdate2005-08-01en
dc.description.abstractMunicipal water suppliers are increasingly faced with implementing programs to address temporary water shortages in the United States. Having reliable estimates for the effectiveness of these programs will help in water supply planning. This dissertation estimates the reductions in residential water-use for voluntary and mandatory water-use restrictions used in Virginia during the 2002 drought. These restrictions were evaluated using both a conventional approach (single-dummy variable for each) and non-conventional approach where program intensity was accounted for. Program intensity was measured by information dissemination for voluntary restrictions, and by information dissemination and enforcement efforts for mandatory restrictions. An unbalanced panel with data from 21 municipal water suppliers was used in the analysis. Under the conventional approach, voluntary restrictions had no significant effect on water-use and mandatory restrictions showed a small to moderate effect. However, program intensity was found to have a significant influence on the magnitude of the water-use reductions in the non-conventional approach. These reductions ranged from 0-7% for voluntary restrictions, and from 0-22% for mandatory restrictions. Moreover, these reductions followed a pattern of increasing program effectiveness with higher levels of information and enforcement. This result indicates that water supply planners need to give considerable attention to the manner in which drought management programs are implemented. Price was also found to have an important effect on residential water-use. A moderate price increase of $3 per 1000 gallons would be expected to reduce water-use by almost 15%. Thus combining mandatory restrictions (implemented at high intensity) with a moderate to high price increase could result in water-use savings approaching 40% based on estimates from this analysis. Other important findings included: a) consumers were responding to a mix of pure marginal price and fixed fees/previous block rates, b) apartment accounts were found to be included in most of the localities residential data and had a significant impact on water-use, and c) the income parameter was measuring more than a pure income effect.en
dc.description.degreePh. D.en
dc.identifier.otheretd-08012005-155838en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-08012005-155838/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/28479en
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartFinalDraftGregHalichEdit16.pdfen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectResidential Water Demanden
dc.subjectVoluntary Restrictionsen
dc.subjectWater Demanden
dc.subjectDrought Managementen
dc.subjectMandatory Restrictionsen
dc.titleEstimating Changes in Residential Water Demand for Voluntary and Mandatory Water-Use Restrictions Implemented during the 2002 Virginia Droughten
dc.typeDissertationen
thesis.degree.disciplineAgricultural and Applied Economicsen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.namePh. D.en

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
FinalDraftGregHalichEdit16.pdf
Size:
438.18 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Doctoral Dissertations