Mind Games: The Ontology of Aviation Safety and its Consequences

dc.contributor.authorGarst, Winfred Joseph Jr.en
dc.contributor.committeechairWamsley, Gary L.en
dc.contributor.committeememberDudley, Larkin S.en
dc.contributor.committeememberGoodsell, Charles T.en
dc.contributor.committeememberRohr, John A.en
dc.contributor.departmentPublic Administration and Public Affairsen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T20:10:06Zen
dc.date.adate2009-05-06en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T20:10:06Zen
dc.date.issued2009-03-26en
dc.date.rdate2009-05-06en
dc.date.sdate2009-04-19en
dc.description.abstractThe regulation and administration of aviation within this country is greatly influenced by a core set of beliefs concerning the safety of aircraft and their operation. This core set of beliefs is referred to as the ontology of aviation safety because it is grounded in a particular reference to reality. The ontology of aviation safety is founded upon the beliefs that aviation operations are either "safe" or "unsafe", that accidents ore preventable, and that if accidents happen then culpability is attributable. These core beliefs support and objectified/reified view of safety which represents a particular reality. Language, more than any other attribute, separates man from other animals. It is through language that man communicates his most profound feelings and ideas. A very basic premise of this dissertation is that language usage reflects beliefs and values. The use of the terms "safe" and "unsafe" when referring to aircraft operations represents the belief that "safe" is an attainable state, in other words, it represents an objectified/reified view of aviation safety. A hermeneutic interpretive approach was used to examine language use within various aviation texts to include: newspaper articles, speeches by Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) officials, testimony by FAA officials before Congress, and selected books concerning aviation safety. By referring to aviation operations as either "safe" or "unsafe" in discourse and dialogue, an objectified/reified view of aviation safety is subtly perpetuated. This view is deeply rooted in the Amierican concept of aviation safety.en
dc.description.degreePh. D.en
dc.identifier.otheretd-04192009-111720en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-04192009-111720/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/27018en
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartDissertation.pdfen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectAviation Safetyen
dc.subjectOntologyen
dc.subjectPublic Administrationen
dc.subjectInstitutionalismen
dc.titleMind Games: The Ontology of Aviation Safety and its Consequencesen
dc.typeDissertationen
thesis.degree.disciplinePublic Administration and Public Affairsen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.namePh. D.en
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Dissertation.pdf
Size:
747.04 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format