Mapping the relationships between trail conditions and experiential elements of long-distance hiking

dc.contributor.authorPeterson, Brian A.en
dc.contributor.authorBrownlee, Matthew T. J.en
dc.contributor.authorMarion, Jeffrey L.en
dc.contributor.departmentForest Resources and Environmental Conservationen
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-02T14:54:03Zen
dc.date.available2020-07-02T14:54:03Zen
dc.date.issued2018-12en
dc.description.abstractTrail users that experience acceptable social and ecological conditions are more likely to act as trail stewards, exhibit proper trail etiquette, and use low-impact practices. However, the relationships between specific trail conditions and experiential elements of long-distance hiking are not well understood. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify how trail conditions influence particular elements of the long-distance hiking experience. The researchers used a mixed-methods approach involving semi-structured interviews (n = 17), quantitative questionnaires (n = 336), ecological measurements of trail conditions (n = 21-5 km sections), and modified Recreation Suitability Mapping (RSM) techniques to quantify the relationships between five trail conditions (trail incision, muddiness, rugosity, trail width, and gradient) and four experiential elements of long-distance hiking (level of challenge, perceived impact to musculoskeletal system, valuation of tread aesthetics, and ability to maintain an ideal hiking pace). Quantified values were weighted, analyzed, and mapped using SPSS 22.0 and ArcMap 10.2.2. Significant differences exist in the scores and distributions of ecological measures across all sections, indicating that trail conditions vary significantly across sampled trail sections. Although, long-distance hikers felt all four experiential elements were important, tread aesthetics was ranked by 50.2% of sampled hikers as the most important experiential element to the overall experience. The resulting information after applying the weights suggests what particular type of experience is likely for each trail section considering the presence of trail conditions.en
dc.description.adminPublic domain – authored by a U.S. government employeeen
dc.description.notesThe authors acknowledge and thank the U.S. National Park Service for funding the portion of this research that included the ecological field measurements (PMIS 189981). The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. National Park Service. Use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government.en
dc.description.sponsorshipU.S. National Park Service [PMIS 189981]en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.06.010en
dc.identifier.eissn1872-6062en
dc.identifier.issn0169-2046en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/99227en
dc.identifier.volume180en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsCreative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/en
dc.subjectAppalachian Trailen
dc.subjectLong-distance hikingen
dc.subjectRecreation suitability mappingen
dc.subjectTrail conditionsen
dc.subjectExperiential impactsen
dc.titleMapping the relationships between trail conditions and experiential elements of long-distance hikingen
dc.title.serialLandscape and Urban Planningen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
dc.type.dcmitypeStillImageen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S0169204618305462-main.pdf
Size:
4.3 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: