Towards a Safety-Centric Evaluation Framework for Augmented Reality Head-up Displays
dc.contributor.author | De Oliveira Faria, Nayara | en |
dc.contributor.committeechair | Gabbard, Joe L. | en |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Smith, Martha Irene | en |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Gibbons, Ronald Bruce | en |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Jeon, Myounghoon | en |
dc.contributor.department | Industrial and Systems Engineering | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-19T08:00:19Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2025-07-19T08:00:19Z | en |
dc.date.issued | 2025-07-18 | en |
dc.description.abstract | This dissertation proposes a pathway towards a safety-centric evaluation framework for augmented reality head-up displays (AR HUDs) in automotive contexts, addressing critical shortcomings in traditional testing methods and emphasizing the integration of human factors. Conducted through a three-phase, mixed-method research program, the present work critically evaluates the inadequacy of conventional glance-based metrics, highlights the safety risks posed by inattentional blindness induced by AR HUD interfaces, and fosters international, cross-sector dialogue to advance AR HUD evaluation practices. Study 1 examined sustained-glance thresholds, identifying three foundational components for safety assessment: the development of standardized reference tasks, the incorporation of ecologically valid driving environments, and the use of performance metrics directly tied to safety outcomes. Study 2 provided empirical evidence that drivers can fail to detect hazards even when looking at them—demonstrating that glance duration alone is insufficient to evaluate AR HUD safety. Study 3 facilitated a two-phase collaboration among academic researchers, industry professionals, and regulatory bodies, exposing persistent gaps between research, practice, and policy, and emphasizing the need for more effective knowledge translation. Building on these insights, this dissertation proposes a strategic roadmap for developing a robust safety evaluation framework for AR HUDs. Key components include the establishment of interdisciplinary, multi-stakeholder committees; the development of a validated evaluation toolkit tailored to AR HUD-specific challenges; the formulation of human-centered design guidelines; and the implementation of regulatory standards grounded in human factors. As the culmination of this research, we propose a safety-focused evaluation framework for AR HUDs that highlights the importance of situation awareness. This approach moves beyond traditional usability metrics to place driver safety at the center of design and assessment, especially in today's complex evolving driving environments. | en |
dc.description.abstractgeneral | This dissertation explores how to improve the safety of advanced in-vehicle technologies—specifically, augmented reality head-up displays (AR HUDs)—by proposing a pathway to a new framework for their evaluation. AR HUDs project information directly onto the windshield, allowing drivers to access information without shiftting their gaze from the road. While these displays offer potential safety benefits, they also introduce potential new risks that need to be evaluated. Our research revealed that traditional testing methods, such as measuring glance duration, are inadequate for assessing AR HUDs. In several cases, drivers failed to notice important hazards even when looking directly at them. Through a series of three studies—including empirical experiments and international collaboration with researchers, automotive industry experts, and regulators—we identified key gaps in current evaluation practices and proposed practical steps to address them. These include developing better safety metrics, improving study design standards, and creating regulations that focus on human factors. As a culmination of this work, we propose a safety-centric evaluation framework for AR HUDs that emphasizes situation awareness—shifting the focus beyond usability alone to place driver safety at the core of design and assessment in today's increasingly complex driving environments. | en |
dc.description.degree | Doctor of Philosophy | en |
dc.format.medium | ETD | en |
dc.identifier.other | vt_gsexam:44364 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10919/136862 | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Virginia Tech | en |
dc.rights | In Copyright | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | en |
dc.subject | Head-up Displays | en |
dc.subject | Augmented Reality | en |
dc.subject | Human Factors | en |
dc.subject | Safety | en |
dc.title | Towards a Safety-Centric Evaluation Framework for Augmented Reality Head-up Displays | en |
dc.type | Dissertation | en |
thesis.degree.discipline | Industrial and Systems Engineering | en |
thesis.degree.grantor | Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University | en |
thesis.degree.level | doctoral | en |
thesis.degree.name | Doctor of Philosophy | en |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1