The Role of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluating Prostate Adenocarcinoma: A Partially-Blinded Retrospective Study of a Prostatectomy Patient Cohort With Whole Gland Histopathology Correlation and Application of PI-RADS or TNM Staging

dc.contributor.authorSridhar, Sajeeven
dc.contributor.authorAbouelfetouh, Zeyaden
dc.contributor.authorCodreanu, Ionen
dc.contributor.authorGupta, Nakulen
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Shuen
dc.contributor.authorEfstathiou, Elenien
dc.contributor.authorKarolyi, Daniel K.en
dc.contributor.authorShen, Steven S.en
dc.contributor.authorLaViolette, Peter S.en
dc.contributor.authorMiles, Brianen
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Diego R.en
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-20T14:30:30Zen
dc.date.available2025-08-20T14:30:30Zen
dc.date.issued2025-04en
dc.description.abstractBackground: Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the current Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1) is considered optional, with primary scoring based on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI). Our study is designed to assess the relative contribution of DCE MRI in a patient-cohort with whole mount prostate histopathology and spatially-mapped prostate adenocarcinoma (PCa) for reference. Methods: We performed a partially-blinded retrospective review of 47 prostatectomy patients with recent multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI). Scans included T2WI, DWI with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping, and DCE imaging. Lesion conspicuity was scored on a 10-point scale with ≥ 6 considered “positive,” and image quality was assessed on a 4-point scale for each sequence. The diagnostic contribution of DCE images was evaluated on a 4-point scale. The mpMRI studies were assigned PI-RADS scores and tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) T-stage with blinded comparison to spatially-mapped whole-mount pathology. Results were compared to the prospective clinical reports, which used standardized PI-RADS templates that emphasize T2WI, DWI and ADC. Results: Per lesion sensitivity for PCa was 93.5%, 82.6%, 63.0%, and 58.7% on T2WI, DCE, ADC and DWI, respectively. Mean lesion conspicuity was 8.5, 7.9, 6.2, and 6.1, on T2W, DCE, ADC and DWI, respectively. The higher values on T2WI and DCE imaging were not significantly different from each other but were both significantly different from DWI and ADC (p < 0.001). DCE scans were determined to have a marked diagnostic contribution in 83% of patients, with the most common diagnostic yield being detection of contralateral peripheral zone tumor or delineating presence/absence of extra-prostatic extension (EPE), contributing to more accurate PCa staging by PI-RADS or TNM, as compared to histopathology. Conclusion: We demonstrate that DCE may contribute to lesion detection and local staging as compared to T2WI plus DWI-ADC alone and that lesion conspicuity using DCE is markedly improved as compared to DWI-ADC. These findings support modification of PI-RADS v2.1 to include use of DCE acquisitions and that a TNM staging is feasible on mpMRI as compared to surgical pathology.en
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
dc.format.extentPages 413-423en
dc.format.extent11 page(s)en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24843en
dc.identifier.eissn1097-0045en
dc.identifier.issn0270-4137en
dc.identifier.issue5en
dc.identifier.pmid39702937en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/137548en
dc.identifier.volume85en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWileyen
dc.relation.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39702937en
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en
dc.subjectADCen
dc.subjectconspicuityen
dc.subjectDCEen
dc.subjectDWIen
dc.subjectMRIen
dc.subjectPI-RADSen
dc.subjectprostate canceren
dc.subjectT2Wen
dc.subject.meshProstateen
dc.subject.meshHumansen
dc.subject.meshAdenocarcinomaen
dc.subject.meshProstatic Neoplasmsen
dc.subject.meshContrast Mediaen
dc.subject.meshMagnetic Resonance Imagingen
dc.subject.meshDiffusion Magnetic Resonance Imagingen
dc.subject.meshNeoplasm Stagingen
dc.subject.meshProstatectomyen
dc.subject.meshRetrospective Studiesen
dc.subject.meshCohort Studiesen
dc.subject.meshAgeden
dc.subject.meshMiddle Ageden
dc.subject.meshMaleen
dc.subject.meshDynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imagingen
dc.titleThe Role of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluating Prostate Adenocarcinoma: A Partially-Blinded Retrospective Study of a Prostatectomy Patient Cohort With Whole Gland Histopathology Correlation and Application of PI-RADS or TNM Stagingen
dc.title.serialThe Prostateen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
dc.type.otherArticleen
dc.type.otherJournalen
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-11-11en
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Techen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/VT Carilion School of Medicineen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/VT Carilion School of Medicine/Radiologyen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/VT Carilion School of Medicine/Radiology/Interventional Radiologyen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
The Role of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluating Prostate Adenocarcinoma A Partially-Blinded R.pdf
Size:
974.59 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.5 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: