A Comparison of Three Group Decision-Making Strategies and Their Effects on the Group Decision-Making Process

dc.contributor.authorRobertson, David Whittakeren
dc.contributor.committeechairEschenmann, Konrad Kurten
dc.contributor.committeememberO'Reilly, Patrick A.en
dc.contributor.committeememberStewart, Daisy L.en
dc.contributor.committeememberPrice, William T. Jr.en
dc.contributor.committeememberBaker, W. Kevinen
dc.contributor.departmentCareer and Technical Educationen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T20:10:44Zen
dc.date.adate2002-04-26en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T20:10:44Zen
dc.date.issued2002-04-22en
dc.date.rdate2003-04-26en
dc.date.sdate2002-04-25en
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this experiment was to compare three group decision-making strategies and their effects on the group decision-making process. Two of the strategies, Dialectical Inquiry and Devil's Advocacy, were structured while the control condition, Unstructured Consensus Seeking, was non-directed, thus unstructured. The following dependent variables were measured: (a) decision quality, (b) cognitive conflict, (c) affective conflict, and (d) decision commitment. Seventy-two undergraduate participants were randomly assigned across 3 conditions into groups of 6 to solve an interactive group decision task. Thirty-six trained observers were randomly assigned across the same conditions to observe intra-group cognitive and affective conflict and to assess how well the undergraduate participants implemented the structured approaches. The unit of comparison was groups (n = 12). The results of this study were analyzed using analysis of variance and no statistical difference was found between the treatment groups on any of the four dependent variables measured. Cognitive conflict levels and commitment to the decision, while not statistically significant, were higher in the two structured conditions compared to the unstructured control condition. A discussion of these results along with directions for future research is provided.en
dc.description.degreePh. D.en
dc.identifier.otheretd-04252002-223855en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-04252002-223855/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/27252en
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartDisserta.doc.pdfen
dc.relation.hasparttitlecontentetc.pdfen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectGroupen
dc.subjectConsensusen
dc.subjectStructureen
dc.subjectDecisionen
dc.subjectConflicten
dc.titleA Comparison of Three Group Decision-Making Strategies and Their Effects on the Group Decision-Making Processen
dc.typeDissertationen
thesis.degree.disciplineCareer and Technical Educationen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.namePh. D.en
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
titlecontentetc.pdf
Size:
45.56 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Disserta.doc.pdf
Size:
578.47 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format