Understanding the effects of spatial scaling on the relationship between urban structure and biodiversity

dc.contributor.authorChoi, Dennis Heejoonen
dc.contributor.authorDarling, Lindsayen
dc.contributor.authorHa, Jaeyoungen
dc.contributor.authorShao, Jinyuanen
dc.contributor.authorSong, Hunsooen
dc.contributor.authorFei, Songlinen
dc.contributor.authorHardiman, Brady S.en
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-07T20:12:16Zen
dc.date.available2025-03-07T20:12:16Zen
dc.date.issued2025-04en
dc.description.abstractConsideration of spatial dependence in heterogeneous urban landscapes is crucial for understanding how urban landscapes shape biodiversity. However, understanding the linkage between urban landscape patterns, both vertically and horizontally, and urban-dwelling bird species at various spatial scales remains an unsolved question. Here, we investigated how patterns of vertical and horizontal urban landscape structure influence urban-dwelling bird species at various spatial scales in the Chicago Region. We utilize a high-density Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) dataset to exam ALS-derived metrics (foliage height diversity, canopy openness, and building volume) in relation to bird diversity. Our results show that LiDAR-derived metrics exhibited significant variation across spatial scales. The negative impact of building volume on bird species is greatest at the smallest scale (slope = -0.24 at 50 m radius), but its effect declined as the scale increased (slope = 0.00 at 500 m radius). Foliage height diversity did not influence bird diversity at small spatial scales but shows a positive effect on bird diversity over 150 m radius (slope = 0.05 to 0.11). Canopy openness changed its sign of slope from negative to positive as the buffer radius increased (between 150 and 200 m buffer radii), indicating that openness may have different roles depending on the spatial scale. Based on our findings, a buffer radius of 150–200 m was concluded to be the threshold distinguishing local and landscape-level variables in this study. In general, horizontal landscape patterns have a stronger influence on urban biodiversity than vertical structures. However, our findings suggest that enhancing the vertical complexity of canopy structures in existing green spaces could be an effective strategy for sustaining bird diversity in urban areas, particularly where expanding green spaces is not feasible. Our study enhances the understanding of urban biodiversity dynamics and provides practical implications for urban landscape management and planning.en
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier104441 (Article number)en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2025.104441en
dc.identifier.issn1569-8432en
dc.identifier.orcidHa, Jaeyoung [0000-0002-8096-0567]en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/124827en
dc.identifier.volume138en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en
dc.subjectUrban green spaceen
dc.subjectUrban landscape patternen
dc.subjectBird species richnessen
dc.subjectUrban biodiversityen
dc.subjectStructural metricsen
dc.titleUnderstanding the effects of spatial scaling on the relationship between urban structure and biodiversityen
dc.title.serialInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformationen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Techen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/Architecture, Arts, and Designen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/All T&R Facultyen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/Architecture, Arts, and Design/School of Designen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S1569843225000883-main.pdf
Size:
8.39 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.5 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: