A qualitative assessment and optimization of URANS modelling for unsteady cavitating flows

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorApte, Dhruv Girishen
dc.contributor.committeechairCoutier-Delgosha, Olivieren
dc.contributor.committeechairPaterson, Eric G.en
dc.contributor.committeememberAlexander, William Nathanen
dc.contributor.committeememberXiao, Hengen
dc.contributor.committeememberGoncalves Da Silva, Ericen
dc.contributor.departmentAerospace and Ocean Engineeringen
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-08T08:01:58Zen
dc.date.available2024-06-08T08:01:58Zen
dc.date.issued2024-06-07en
dc.description.abstractCavitation is characterized by the formation of vapor bubbles when the pressure in a working fluid drops sharply below the vapor pressure. These bubbles, upon exiting the low-pressure region burst emanating tremendous amounts of energy. Unsteady cavitating flows have been influential in several aspects from being responsible for erosion damage and vibrations in hydraulic engineering devices to being used for non-invasive medical surgeries and drilling for geothermal energy. While the phenomenon has been investigated using both experimental and numerical methods, it continues to pose a challenge for numerical modelling techniques due to its flow unsteadiness and the cavitation-turbulence interaction. One of the principal aspects to modelling cavitation requires the coupling of a cavitation and a turbulence model. While, scale-resolving turbulence modelling techniques like Direct Numerical Simulations (DNS) and Large Eddy Simulations (LES) upto a certain extent may seem an intuitive solution, the physical complexities involved with cavitation result in extremely high computational costs. Thus, Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) models have been widely utilized as a workhorse for cavitating simulations. However, URANS models are unable to reproduce the periodic vapor shedding observed in experiments and thus, are often corrected by empirical correction. Recently, some models termed as hybrid RANS-LES models that behave as RANS or LES depending on location of flow have been introduced and employed to model cavitating flows. In addition, there has also been a rise in defining some frameworks that use data from high-fidelity simulations or experiments to drive numerical algorithms and aid standard turbulence modelling procedures for accurately simulating turbulent flows. This dissertation is aimed at (1) evaluating the abilities of these corrections, traditional URANS and hybrid RANS-LES models to model cavitation and (2) optimizing the URANS modelling strategy by designing a methodology driven by experimental data to augment the turbulence modelling to simulate cavitating flow in a converging-diverging nozzle.en
dc.description.abstractgeneralThe famous painting Arion on the Dolphin by the French artist François Boucher shows a dolphin rescuing the poet Arion from the choppy seas after being thrown overboard. Today, seeing silhouettes of dolphins swimming near the shore as the Sun sets is a calming sight. However, as these creatures splash their fins in the water, these fins create a drastic pressure difference resulting in the formation of ribbons of vapor bubbles. As the bubbles exit the low-pressure zones, they collapse and release tremendous amounts of energy. This energy manifests in the form of shockwaves rendering this pleasant sight to the human eye, extremely painful for dolphins. These shocks also impact the metal blades in hydraulic machinery like pumps and ship propellers. This dissertation aims to investigate the physics driving this phenomenon using accurate numerical simulations. We first conduct two-dimensional simulations and observe that standard numerical techniques to model the turbulence are unable to simulate cavitation accurately. The investigation is then extended to three-dimensional simulations using hybrid RANS-LES models that aim to strike a delicate balance between accuracy and efficiency. It is observed that these models are able to reproduce the flow dynamics as observed in experiments but are extremely expensive in terms of computational costs due to the three-dimensional nature of the calculations. The investigation then switches to a data-driven approach where a machine learning algorithm driven by experimental data informs the standard turbulence models and is able to simulate cavitating flows accurately and efficiently.en
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophyen
dc.format.mediumETDen
dc.identifier.othervt_gsexam:40511en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/119366en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en
dc.subjectcavitationen
dc.subjectturbulence modellingen
dc.subjectdata-driven modellingen
dc.subjectcomputational fluid dynamicsen
dc.subjecthybrid RANS-LES modelsen
dc.titleA qualitative assessment and optimization of URANS modelling for unsteady cavitating flowsen
dc.typeDissertationen
thesis.degree.disciplineAerospace Engineeringen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
Apte_DG_D_2024.pdf
Size:
25.96 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Doctoral Dissertations