Assessing the Relationship between Occupational Injury Risk and Performance: the Efficacy of Adding Adjustability and Using Exoskeletons in the Context of a Simulated Drilling Task

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorAlabdulkarim, Saad A.en
dc.contributor.committeechairNussbaum, Maury A.en
dc.contributor.committeememberDickerson, Deborah Elspethen
dc.contributor.committeememberKim, Sun Wooken
dc.contributor.committeememberSrinivasan, Divyaen
dc.contributor.departmentIndustrial and Systems Engineeringen
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-11T06:00:30Zen
dc.date.available2019-05-11T06:00:30Zen
dc.date.issued2017-11-16en
dc.description.abstractWork-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) continue to occur despite an increasing understanding of the risk factors that initiate these disorders. Ergonomics is commonly seen as a health and safety approach that has no influence on performance, a perspective potentially hindering intervention proposals in practice. Highlighting potential performance benefits can facilitate intervention cost-justification, along with the traditional focus on reducing exposure to injury risk. The main objective of this research was to examine the dual influences (i.e., on performance and injury risk) of two distinct types of interventions: adding adjustability, as a commonly advocated approach when considering ergonomics early in the (re)design phase to change task demands; and using exoskeletons to enhance worker capacity. A simulated drilling task was used, which was considered informative as it entailed diverse demands (precision, strength, and speed) and permitted quantifying two dimensions of task performance (productivity and quality). The dual influences of three levels of workstation adjustability were examined first; increasing adjustability improved performance, with this benefit occurring only when a given level of adjustability also succeeded in reducing ergonomic risk. Across examined conditions, several significant linear associations were found between risk (e.g., Strain Index score) and performance metrics (e.g., completion time), further supporting an inverse relationship between these two outcomes. The dual influences of three distinct passive exoskeletal designs were investigated/compared subsequently, in a simulated overhead drilling task and considering the potential moderating effects of tool mass and precision requirements. Specific designs were: full-body (Full) and upper-body (Arm) exoskeletons with attached mechanical arms; and an upper-body (Shl) exoskeleton providing primarily shoulder support. Both designs with mechanical arms increased static and median total muscle activity while deteriorating quality. The Shl design reduced shoulder loading while increasing dominant upper arm loading and deteriorating quality in the highest precision requirements. Influences of both increasing precision and tool mass were fairly consistent across the examined designs. As such, no single design was obviously superior in both physical demands and performance. Although future work is needed under more diverse/realistic scenarios, these results may be helpful to (re)design interventions that achieve dual benefits on performance and injury risks.en
dc.description.degreePHDen
dc.format.mediumETDen
dc.identifier.othervt_gsexam:13067en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/89485en
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectexoskeletonen
dc.subjectadjustabilityen
dc.subjectintervention effectivenessen
dc.subjectPerformanceen
dc.subjectinjury risken
dc.titleAssessing the Relationship between Occupational Injury Risk and Performance: the Efficacy of Adding Adjustability and Using Exoskeletons in the Context of a Simulated Drilling Tasken
dc.typeDissertationen
thesis.degree.disciplineIndustrial and Systems Engineeringen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.namePHDen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Alabdulkarim_SA_D_2017.pdf
Size:
7.69 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Alabdulkarim_SA_D_2017_support_4.pdf
Size:
427.26 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supporting documents
Download
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Alabdulkarim_SA_D_2017_support_1.jpg
Size:
166.56 KB
Format:
Joint Photographic Experts Group/JPEG File Interchange Format (JFIF)
Description:
Supporting documents
Download
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Alabdulkarim_SA_D_2017_support_3.pdf
Size:
415.06 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supporting documents
Download

Collections

Doctoral Dissertations