How Do Military Veteran Students Write? Exploring the Effectiveness of Current Writing Pedagogy

Simple item page
dc.contributorNorthern Kentucky Universityen
dc.contributorVirginia Tech. Department of English. Center for the Study of Rhetoric in Societyen
dc.contributorVirginia Tech. Veterans Studies Groupen
dc.contributorCline, Daviden
dc.contributor.authorSingleton, Meredithen
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-10T03:25:14Zen
dc.date.available2015-08-10T03:25:14Zen
dc.date.copyright2014en
dc.date.issued2014-04-28en
dc.description.abstractThrough Post-911 GI Bill benefits, military veterans are flooding college admissions offices and writing classes at rates not seen since the World War II era. According to the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, over 1 million veterans attended colleges and universities between 2009 and 2013; and 53.6 percent of veteran students using benefits applied them toward completing undergraduate work at a college or vocational/technical school (“Annual Benefits Report,” 2011). Clearly, many writing instructors will likely encounter a military veteran in their classes in the near future. Unlike the majority of first-year and undergraduate writing students, these students bring with them deeply engrained professional training that starkly contrasts with current writing pedagogy. Contemporary writing curricula teach and engage traditional students in communal writing practices focused on self-exploration and personal meaning-making. However, for the returning military veteran, these strategies may prove problematic. Through training in highly structured environments, they learn to do as instructed, not ask questions, and successfully complete the tasks assigned, with little room for error or personal adaptation. In an incredible culture shock, and in direct contrast with their previous superiors, writing instructors encourage these students to determine strategies that work based on personal preferences, actively avoiding prescriptive writing instruction and shunning the idea of presenting writing as a successive, inflexible process. College writing instructors, therefore, need to ask whether or not current writing pedagogy meets the needs of military veteran students and employs their professional training. Furthermore, what can instructors do to better assist these students as they transition from military to academic training? Thus, this substantial shift in the writing student profile presents an opportunity to re-evaluate current teaching strategies to determine approaches that will more directly tap in to these students’ highly developed skills. This paper responds to Hart and Thompson’s call to action (2013) to writing programs and instructors to begin exploring their veteran populations. Seeking a better understanding of the military veteran student’s unique training, this paper contrasts current military training materials with practices and approaches in the writing classroom. This paper addresses the assumption that entry-level writing students succeed in an environment where they are free to explore flexible writing strategies and methods, an assumption that may leave veteran students at a distinct disadvantage. The results of this analysis call into question the effectiveness of current writing pedagogy for this particular audience, suggesting rather a composition pedagogy that returns to cognitivist theories of composing (Flower, 1989; Flower & Hayes, 1981) and recognizes that these students have learned to succeed in very prescriptive, rigid environments. This paper suggests that it may benefit these students to learn the academic writing process through their prior frame of reference, rather than through the less structured one of current pedagogy. Expanding on an initial case study of one military veteran college writer, the ultimate goal of this research is to explore alternative, effective pedagogies that better intersect with the military training these students possess.en
dc.description.notesThe Second Conference on Veterans in Society: Humanizing the Discourse was held at the Hotel Roanoke in Roanoke, VA from April 27-28, 2014en
dc.description.notesPresented during Panel Session 2B: Writing and Preserving Veterans' Words, moderated by David Clineen
dc.format.extent10 pagesen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documenten
dc.identifier.citationSingleton, M. (2014, April). How do military veteran students write? Exploring the effectiveness of current writing pedagogy. Paper presented at the Second Conference on Veterans in Society: Humanizing the Discourse, Roanoke, VA.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/56353en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.relation.ispartofSecond Conference on Veterans in Society: Humanizing the Discourseen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.holderSingleton, Meredithen
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectStudent writingen
dc.subjectMilitary writingen
dc.subjectStudent veteransen
dc.subjectPedagogyen
dc.subjectViSen
dc.subjectVeterans in Societyen
dc.titleHow Do Military Veteran Students Write? Exploring the Effectiveness of Current Writing Pedagogyen
dc.title.alternativeAccessing Skills: Assisting Military Veteran Students in the Traditional Writing Classroomen
dc.typePresentationen
dc.typeConference proceedingen
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Singleton_2014_How_Military_Vet_Students_Write.pdf
Size:
167.58 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Name:
Singleton_2014_How_Military_Vet_Students_Write.docx
Size:
55.93 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word XML
Description:
Download
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Singleton2014_Appendix 1_slides.pdf
Size:
4.78 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download

Collections

Veterans in Society 2014: Humanizing the Discourse
Veterans in Society 2014: Humanizing the Discourse, Center for the Study of Rhetoric in Society