Conceptual Development and Empirical Testing of an Outdoor Recreation Experience Model: The Recreation Experience Matrix (REM)
dc.contributor.author | Walker, Gordon James | en |
dc.contributor.committeecochair | Roggenbuck, Joseph W. | en |
dc.contributor.committeecochair | Hull, Robert Bruce IV | en |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Williams, Daniel R. | en |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Kiecolt, K. Jill | en |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Hertel, Bradley R. | en |
dc.contributor.department | Forestry | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-03-14T20:21:49Z | en |
dc.date.adate | 1997-03-31 | en |
dc.date.available | 2014-03-14T20:21:49Z | en |
dc.date.issued | 1997-03-31 | en |
dc.date.rdate | 1997-03-31 | en |
dc.date.sdate | 1998-07-11 | en |
dc.description.abstract | This dissertation examines four issues, including: (a) whether outdoor recreation experiences not included in the Recreation Experience Preference (REP) scales exist; (b) whether these experiences can be categorized using a framework called the Recreation Experience Matrix (REM); (c) how well the Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) variables of activity, setting, and expertise explain the types of experiences outdoor recreationists receive; and (d) how well two new variables--primary mode and mode dependence--explain the types of experiences outdoor recreationists receive. In order to address these issues, an on-site questionnaire was distributed at Mount Rogers National Recreation Area in Virginia during October and November, 1995 A total of 410 people completed this questionnaire. Of these, 336 provided useable addresses for a follow-up mail-out questionnaire, with 169 (50.3%) actually returning it. After performing a variety of statistical analyses, it was found that: (a) some outdoor recreationists did report having non-REP experiences involving identity, cognition, absorption, and self-concept; (b) indirect support does exist for classifying outdoor recreation experiences using the REM framework; and (c) the ROS variables of activity, setting, and expertise, do explain some outdoor recreation experiences, as do the new variables of primary mode and mode dependence. | en |
dc.description.degree | Ph. D. | en |
dc.identifier.other | etd-3345131939761081 | en |
dc.identifier.sourceurl | http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-3345131939761081/ | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10919/30474 | en |
dc.publisher | Virginia Tech | en |
dc.relation.haspart | Walker_2.pdf | en |
dc.relation.haspart | Walker_3.pdf | en |
dc.relation.haspart | Walker_4.pdf | en |
dc.relation.haspart | Walker_5.pdf | en |
dc.relation.haspart | Walker_1.pdf | en |
dc.rights | In Copyright | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | en |
dc.subject | recreation experience matrix | en |
dc.subject | recreation experience preference scales | en |
dc.subject | outdoor recreation | en |
dc.subject | recreation opportunity spectrum | en |
dc.title | Conceptual Development and Empirical Testing of an Outdoor Recreation Experience Model: The Recreation Experience Matrix (REM) | en |
dc.type | Dissertation | en |
thesis.degree.discipline | Forestry | en |
thesis.degree.grantor | Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University | en |
thesis.degree.level | doctoral | en |
thesis.degree.name | Ph. D. | en |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 5 of 5