VTechWorks staff will be away for the winter holidays starting Tuesday, December 24, 2024, through Wednesday, January 1, 2025, and will not be replying to requests during this time. Thank you for your patience, and happy holidays!
 

Prevalence of Microplastics in the Eastern Oyster Crassostrea virginica in the Chesapeake Bay: The Impact of Different Digestion Methods on Microplastic Properties

dc.contributor.authorAung, Theten
dc.contributor.authorBatish, Inayaten
dc.contributor.authorOvissipour, Rezaen
dc.coverage.countryUnited Statesen
dc.coverage.stateVirginiaen
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-11T13:50:05Zen
dc.date.available2022-01-11T13:50:05Zen
dc.date.issued2022-01-10en
dc.date.updated2022-01-10T14:38:27Zen
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to determine the microplastic prevalence in eastern oysters (<i>C. virginica</i>) in three sites in the Chesapeake Bay in Virginia and optimize the digestion methods. The digestion results illustrate that the lowest recovery rate and digestion recovery were related to enzymatic, enzymatic + hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>), and HCl 5% treatments, while the highest digestion recovery and recovery rate were observed in H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and basic (KOH) treatments. Nitric acid digestion resulted in satisfying digestion recovery (100%), while no blue polyethylene microplastics were observed due to the poor recovery rate. In addition, nitric acid altered the color, changed the Raman spectrum intensity, and melted polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET). In order to determine the number of microplastics, 144 oysters with an approximately similar size and weight from three sites, including the James River, York River, and Eastern Shore, were evaluated. Fragments were the most abundant microplastics among the different microplastics, followed by fibers and beads, in the three sites. A significantly higher number of fragments were found in the James River, probably due to the greater amount of human activities. The number of microplastics per gram of oyster tissue was higher in the James River, with 7 MPs/g tissue, than in the York River and Eastern Shore, with 6.7 and 5.6 MPs/g tissue.en
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationAung, T.; Batish, I.; Ovissipour, R. Prevalence of Microplastics in the Eastern Oyster Crassostrea virginica in the Chesapeake Bay: The Impact of Different Digestion Methods on Microplastic Properties. Toxics 2022, 10, 29.en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10010029en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/107538en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMDPIen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectmicroplasticsen
dc.subjectbivalvesen
dc.subjectisolationen
dc.subjectChesapeake Bayen
dc.subjectRaman spectroscopyen
dc.titlePrevalence of Microplastics in the Eastern Oyster Crassostrea virginica in the Chesapeake Bay: The Impact of Different Digestion Methods on Microplastic Propertiesen
dc.title.serialToxicsen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
toxics-10-00029.pdf
Size:
1.18 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: