Who can submit an excellent review for this manuscript in the next 30 days? - Peer Reviewing in the age of overload

dc.contributor.authorAlhoori, Hameden
dc.contributor.authorFox, Edward A.en
dc.contributor.authorFrommholz, Ingoen
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Haimingen
dc.contributor.authorCoupette, Corinnaen
dc.contributor.authorRieck, Bastian A.en
dc.contributor.authorGhosal, Tirthankaren
dc.contributor.authorWu, Jianen
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-22T13:08:35Zen
dc.date.available2024-01-22T13:08:35Zen
dc.date.issued2023en
dc.description.abstractWith millions of research articles published yearly, the peer review process is in danger of collapsing, especially in 'hot' areas with popular conferences. Challenges arise from the large number of manuscripts submitted, skyrocketing use of preprint archives and institutional repositories, problems regarding the identification and availability of experts, conflicts of interest, and bias in reviewing. Such issues can affect the integrity of the reviewing process as well as the timeliness, quality, credibility, and reproducibility of research articles. Several solutions and systems have been suggested, but none work well, and neither authors nor editors are happy with how long it takes to complete reviewing the submitted research. This panel addresses these challenges and potential solutions, including digital libraries that recommend reviewers, as well as broader issues like opportunities for identifying peer reviewers for scholarly journals by engaging doctoral students and postdocs, as well as those who recently completed their Ph.D.en
dc.description.versionAccepted versionen
dc.format.extentPages 319-320en
dc.format.extent2 page(s)en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1109/JCDL57899.2023.00077en
dc.identifier.eissn2575-8152en
dc.identifier.isbn9798350399318en
dc.identifier.issn2575-7865en
dc.identifier.orcidFox, Edward [0000-0003-1447-6870]en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/117435en
dc.identifier.volume2023-Juneen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherACMen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectPeer reviewen
dc.subjectScholarly publishingen
dc.subjectComputer Scienceen
dc.titleWho can submit an excellent review for this manuscript in the next 30 days? - Peer Reviewing in the age of overloaden
dc.title.serial2023 ACM/IEEE JOINT CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL LIBRARIES, JCDLen
dc.typeConference proceedingen
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
dc.type.otherProceedings Paperen
dc.type.otherBook in seriesen
pubs.finish-date2023-06-30en
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Techen
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech/Engineeringen
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech/Engineering/Computer Scienceen
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech/All T&R Facultyen
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech/Engineering/COE T&R Facultyen
pubs.start-date2023-06-26en

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
JCDL2023PanelFindingReviewers.pdf
Size:
358.75 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.5 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: