An international study of curricular organizers for the study of technology

dc.contributor.authorBarnes, James L.en
dc.contributor.committeecochairDugger, William E. Jr.en
dc.contributor.committeecochairBame, E. Allenen
dc.contributor.committeememberPinder, Charles A.en
dc.contributor.committeememberLaPorte, James E.en
dc.contributor.committeememberParks, David J.en
dc.contributor.departmentEducationen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T21:09:08Zen
dc.date.adate2004-02-03en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T21:09:08Zen
dc.date.issued1987-05-11en
dc.date.rdate2004-02-03en
dc.date.sdate2004-02-03en
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the study was to identify the key descriptors of a definition of technology and curricular organizers for use in the study of technology. Seven panels were used for the three round Delphi to identify the key descriptors and curricular organizers. The panels included: (1) technology educators, (2) philosophers of education, (3) philosophers of technology, (4) historians of technology, (5) anthropologists of technology, (6) futurists, (7) industrialists/business leaders. A Thurstone and Chave Method of Equal Appearing Intervals was used to assign scale and Q values to each item ranked in the Q sort. An 80th centile was used for an item to achieve a consensus. The results of both research questions were rank ordered based on scale value from highest to lowest. Fourteen key descriptors of a definition of technology obtained a consensus. These are innovation; invention; creative; extends human capabilities (physical, social ,and intellectual); a process (change, individual, corporate, design, creative, and systematic); extension of human potential; problem solving; purposeful human manipulation of the material world; closely linked to science but not simply applied science, body of knowledge; used to solve problems and create opportunities; played an important role in the emergence of Homo sapiens; a system of tools, knowledge, and behaviors associated with the exploitation of environments; and has social, economic, political, and environmental impacts. Seven curricular organizers achieved a consensus. These are problem solving; process organizers (creativity, enterprise, systems, inventions, and problem solving); the process of technology; design and innovation; research and development; and awareness of implications and potential of technology (health, food, communication, production, and control).en
dc.description.degreeEd. D.en
dc.format.extentx, 283 leavesen
dc.format.mediumBTDen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.otheretd-02032004-161547en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-02032004-161547/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/37284en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartBarnes,J.pdfen
dc.relation.isformatofOCLC# 16798168en
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectTechnology philosophyen
dc.subjectcurricular organizersen
dc.subjectTechnologyen
dc.subjectDelphi studyen
dc.subjecteducation historyen
dc.subjecteducation anthropologyen
dc.subject.lccLD5655.V856 1987.B376en
dc.subject.lcshEducational innovationsen
dc.subject.lcshIndustrial arts -- Study and teachingen
dc.subject.lcshTechnological innovationsen
dc.titleAn international study of curricular organizers for the study of technologyen
dc.typeDissertationen
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
thesis.degree.disciplineEducationen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Educationen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Barnes,J.pdf
Size:
11.2 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: