Measuring the educational attainment of proprietary students: an assessment of equal opportunity from national data

dc.contributor.authorCheng, Xingen
dc.contributor.committeechairClowes, Darrel A.en
dc.contributor.committeememberAndrew, Loyd D.en
dc.contributor.committeememberMorgan, Samuel D.en
dc.contributor.committeememberMuffo, John A.en
dc.contributor.committeememberParks, David J.en
dc.contributor.departmentHigher Education Administrationen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T21:18:56Zen
dc.date.adate2005-09-16en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T21:18:56Zen
dc.date.issued1990-12-05en
dc.date.rdate2005-09-16en
dc.date.sdate2005-09-16en
dc.description.abstractThis study was designed to provide an overall estimate of proprietary schools' contribution to the equality of educational opportunity in the postsecondary educational system. Two compatible databases, the National Longitudinal Study of the High School Class of 1972 (NLS) and High School and Beyond (HSB), were used to draw two parallel proprietary samples. Each proprietary sample was compared with its counterparts in the community college and the four-year institution sectors. Gender, race, socioeconomic status, aptitude, and Students' and their mothers' educational aspiration were the factors tested in the study to determine the extent to which they contribute to students' choice of proprietary schools and their educational attainment in a given period of time. Discriminant analysis was utilized to differentiate the characteristics of proprietary school enrollees from the characteristics of those who entered community colleges and four-year institutions. Multiple regression was conducted on each group of students to identify the major factors associated with students' educational attainment by the type of institution of first enrollment. The major findings of this study include: (1) Proprietary schools enrolled a considerable number of "disadvantaged" students: women, minorities, people from low socioeconomic background, and those with low aptitude scores. (2) Students’ and their mothers’ educational aspirations were the most influential factors affecting students’ choice among the three types of postsecondary institutions, and proprietary students’ aspirations were lower than that of community college and four-year institution students. (3) Most proprietary Students did not reach the level of a two-year degree or beyond, and those who eventually attained a two-year degree or beyond were very likely to be students with high aptitude. (4) Study of the delayed entrants into proprietary schools confirmed the major findings derived from the initial entrants, except the aspiration variable played a less significant role in determining the educational attainment of delayed entrants than that for the initial entrants.en
dc.description.degreeEd. D.en
dc.format.extentix, 103 leavesen
dc.format.mediumBTDen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.otheretd-09162005-115022en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-09162005-115022/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/39365en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartLD5655.V856_1990.C548.pdfen
dc.relation.isformatofOCLC# 22923265en
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subject.lccLD5655.V856 1990.C548en
dc.subject.lcshEducational equalization -- United Statesen
dc.subject.lcshPrivate schools -- United Statesen
dc.subject.lcshStudents -- United States -- Economic conditionsen
dc.subject.lcshStudents -- United States -- Social conditionsen
dc.subject.lcshVocational education -- United Statesen
dc.titleMeasuring the educational attainment of proprietary students: an assessment of equal opportunity from national dataen
dc.typeDissertationen
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
thesis.degree.disciplineHigher Education Administrationen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Educationen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LD5655.V856_1990.C548.pdf
Size:
5.07 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: