VTechWorks staff will be away for the winter holidays starting Tuesday, December 24, 2024, through Wednesday, January 1, 2025, and will not be replying to requests during this time. Thank you for your patience, and happy holidays!
 

Development of an extended hyperbolic model for concrete-to-soil interfaces

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorGómez, Jesús Emilioen
dc.contributor.committeechairFilz, George M.en
dc.contributor.committeememberKapania, Rakesh K.en
dc.contributor.committeememberDuncan, James Michaelen
dc.contributor.committeememberMartin, James R. IIen
dc.contributor.committeememberBrandon, Thomas L.en
dc.contributor.departmentCivil Engineeringen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T20:14:14Zen
dc.date.adate2000-07-27en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T20:14:14Zen
dc.date.issued2000-07-19en
dc.date.rdate2001-07-27en
dc.date.sdate2000-07-24en
dc.description.abstractPlacement and compaction of the backfill behind an earth retaining wall may induce a vertical shear force at the soil-to-wall interface. This vertical shear force, or downdrag, is beneficial for the stability of the structure. A significant reduction in construction costs may result if the downdrag is accounted for during design. This potential reduction in costs is particularly interesting in the case of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers lock walls. A simplified procedure is available in the literature for estimating the downdrag force developed at the wall-backfill interface during backfilling of a retaining wall. However, finite element analyses of typical U.S. Army Corps of Engineers lock walls have shown that the magnitude of the downdrag force may decrease during operation of the lock with a rise in the water table in the backfill. They have also shown that pre- and post-construction stress paths followed by interface elements often involve simultaneous changes in shear and normal stresses and unloading-reloading. The hyperbolic formulation for interfaces (Clough and Duncan 1971) is accurate for modeling the interface response in the primary loading stage under constant normal stress. However, it has not been extended to model simultaneous changes in shear and normal stresses or unloading-reloading of the interface. The purpose of this research was to develop an interface model capable of giving accurate predictions of the interface response under field loading conditions, and to implement this model in a finite element program. In order to develop the necessary experimental data, a series of tests were performed on interfaces between concrete and two different types of sand. The tests included initial loading, staged shear, unloading-reloading, and shearing along complex stress paths. An extended hyperbolic model for interfaces was developed based on the results of the tests. The model is based on Clough and Duncan (1971) hyperbolic formulation, which has been extended to model the interface response to a variety of stress paths. Comparisons between model calculations and tests results showed that the model provides accurate estimates of the response of interfaces along complex stress paths. The extended hyperbolic model was implemented in the finite element program SOILSTRUCT-ALPHA, used by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for analyses of lock walls. A pilot-scale test was performed in the Instrumented Retaining Wall (IRW) at Virginia Tech that simulated construction and operation of a lock wall. SOILSTRUCT-ALPHA analyses of the IRW provided accurate estimates of the downdrag magnitude throughout inundation of the backfill. It is concluded that the extended hyperbolic model as implemented in SOILSTRUCT-ALPHA is adequate for routine analyses of lock walls.en
dc.description.degreePh. D.en
dc.identifier.otheretd-07242000-15060006en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-07242000-15060006/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/28375en
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartAppendixD.pdfen
dc.relation.haspartAppendixC.pdfen
dc.relation.haspartAppendixB.pdfen
dc.relation.haspart07chapter4.pdfen
dc.relation.haspartAppendixA.pdfen
dc.relation.haspartAppendixE.pdfen
dc.relation.haspart02abstract.pdfen
dc.relation.haspart04chapter1.pdfen
dc.relation.haspart05chapter2.pdfen
dc.relation.haspart10referen.pdfen
dc.relation.haspart01TITLE.pdfen
dc.relation.haspart06chapter3.pdfen
dc.relation.haspartAppendixF.pdfen
dc.relation.haspartVITA.pdfen
dc.relation.haspart08chapter5.pdfen
dc.relation.haspart03contents.pdfen
dc.relation.haspart09chapter6.pdfen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectinterface elementen
dc.subjectbackfill inundationen
dc.subjectunloading-reloadingen
dc.subjectdata normalizationen
dc.subjecthyperbolic parameteren
dc.subjectconcreteen
dc.subjectyield surfaceen
dc.subjectstaged shearen
dc.subjectinterface modelen
dc.subjecthydrocompressionen
dc.subjectinterface testingen
dc.subjectsanden
dc.subjectyieldingen
dc.titleDevelopment of an extended hyperbolic model for concrete-to-soil interfacesen
dc.typeDissertationen
thesis.degree.disciplineCivil Engineeringen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.namePh. D.en

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 5 of 17
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01TITLE.pdf
Size:
4.6 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Thumbnail Image
Name:
02abstract.pdf
Size:
6.81 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Thumbnail Image
Name:
03contents.pdf
Size:
58.57 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Thumbnail Image
Name:
04chapter1.pdf
Size:
88.1 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Thumbnail Image
Name:
05chapter2.pdf
Size:
211.57 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Doctoral Dissertations