Development of the MPAS-CMAQ coupled system (V1.0) for multiscale global air quality modeling

dc.contributor.authorWong, David C.en
dc.contributor.authorWillison, Jeffen
dc.contributor.authorPleim, Jonathan E.en
dc.contributor.authorSarwar, Golamen
dc.contributor.authorBeidler, Jamesen
dc.contributor.authorBullock, Russen
dc.contributor.authorHerwehe, Jerold A.en
dc.contributor.authorGilliam, Roben
dc.contributor.authorKang, Daiwenen
dc.contributor.authorHogrefe, Christianen
dc.contributor.authorPouliot, Georgeen
dc.contributor.authorForoutan, Hoseinen
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-23T18:11:10Zen
dc.date.available2026-02-23T18:11:10Zen
dc.date.issued2024-11-07en
dc.description.abstractThe Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model has been used for regulatory purposes at the U.S. EPA and in the research community for decades. In 2012, we released the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF)CMAQ coupled model that enables aerosol information from CMAQ to affect meteorological processes through direct effects on shortwave radiation. Both CMAQ and WRF-CMAQ are considered limited-area models. Recently, we have extended domain coverage to the global scale by linking the meteorological Model for Prediction Across Scales – Atmosphere (MPAS-A, hereafter referred simply to as MPAS) with CMAQ to form the MPAS-CMAQ global coupled model. To configure these three different models, i.e., CMAQ (offline), WRF-CMAQ, and MPAS-CMAQ, we have developed the Advanced Air Quality Modeling System (AAQMS) for constructing each of them effortlessly. We evaluate this newly built MPAS-CMAQ coupled model using two global configurations: a 120 km uniform mesh and a 92–25 km variable mesh with the finer area over North America. Preliminary computational tests show good scalability and model evaluation, when using a 3-year simulation (2014–2016) for the uniform mesh case and a monthly simulation of January and July 2016 for the variable mesh case, on ozone and PM<inf>2.5</inf> and show reasonable performance with respect to observations. The 92–25 km configuration has a high bias in wintertime surface ozone across the United States, and this bias is consistent with the 120 km result. Summertime surface ozone in the 92–25 km configuration is less biased than the 120 km case. The MPAS-CMAQ system reasonably reproduces the daily variability of daily average PM from the Air Quality System (AQS) network.en
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
dc.format.extentPages 7855-7866en
dc.format.extent12 page(s)en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7855-2024en
dc.identifier.eissn1991-9603en
dc.identifier.issn1991-959Xen
dc.identifier.issue21en
dc.identifier.orcidForoutan, Hosein [0000-0003-4185-3571]en
dc.identifier.otherPMC11960730en
dc.identifier.pmid40177305en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/141523en
dc.identifier.volume17en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCopernicusen
dc.relation.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40177305en
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.titleDevelopment of the MPAS-CMAQ coupled system (V1.0) for multiscale global air quality modelingen
dc.title.serialGeoscientific Model Developmenten
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
dc.type.otherArticleen
dc.type.otherJournalen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Techen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/Engineeringen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/Engineering/Civil & Environmental Engineeringen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/All T&R Facultyen
pubs.organisational-groupVirginia Tech/Engineering/COE T&R Facultyen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
gmd-17-7855-2024.pdf
Size:
4.96 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.5 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: