Burnout in the Trenches: Unpacking the Systemic Forces Impacting Community Mental Health Clinicians
dc.contributor.author | Fennell, Tiara Monet | en |
dc.contributor.committeechair | Teaster, Pamela B. | en |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Dolbin-MacNab, Megan Leigh | en |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Sanner, Caroline | en |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Fullen, Matthew C. | en |
dc.contributor.department | Adult Learning and Human Resource Development | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-23T08:01:03Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2025-04-23T08:01:03Z | en |
dc.date.issued | 2025-04-22 | en |
dc.description.abstract | Across United States (US) history, individual and population-based mental health has been overlooked or outright dismissed within the health care system. In 1955, 77% of all mental health treatment episodes took place in an inpatient setting, and only 379,000 episodes of treatment were provided in outpatient settings. By 1968, the number of inpatient treatments increased to two million. By 2010, Glied and Frank (2016) estimated that the US spent an estimated $352 billion to provide care and support to people with mental illness. However, even with the large investment from the government, the number of patients needing care outnumber the number of clinicians who can provide care. Due to financial strains as well as increased demands for services, clinicians are experiencing their own problems (e.g., emotional exhaustion, lower job satisfaction, diminished self-concept, and a loss of concern for clients), which are symptoms of burnout. Given the systemic impact that a clinician's experience can produce on the provision of mental health services, it is critical to explore the experiences of community mental health (CMH) clinicians directly in order to inform changes in policy and practice in CMH. Thus, the purpose of this interpretative phenomenological study is to explore the experiences of CMH therapists and how they confront burnout. Through the additional lens of the Mental Health Systems Ecology (MHSE) model, the systemic nature of CMH will be highlighted to identify opportunities for mental health service reform and improved therapeutic interventions. Findings from this study revealed three major themes: exploitation, referring to the structural and systemic pressures that place undue burdens on CMH clinicians; ethical and moral dilemmas, highlighting the difficult decisions therapists must navigate when balancing client care with institutional constraints; and grounded in purpose as a form of resilience, illustrating how clinicians find meaning in their work to sustain themselves despite ongoing challenges. These themes underscore the need for systemic changes in CMH settings to mitigate burnout and support clinician well-being. | en |
dc.description.abstractgeneral | Throughout U.S. history, mental health has often been ignored or not given enough attention in the larger health care system. For example, back in 1955, most mental health treatment happened in hospitals, with very few people getting help outside of them. Over the years, the need for mental health care has grown significantly. By 2010, the U.S. was spending around $352 billion to support people with mental health conditions. Still, even with all that spending, there aren't enough mental health professionals to meet the growing demand for care. Because of limited funding and the high demand for services, many mental health providers are struggling. They may feel emotionally drained, less satisfied with their jobs, and even disconnected from the people they're trying to help—signs of what's known as burnout. This study takes a closer look at what community mental health (CMH) therapists are going through and how they're coping with burnout. Using a framework called the Mental Health Systems Ecology (MHSE) model, the study also considers how larger systems—like workplaces, policies, and communities—affect these therapists and their ability to provide care. The research identified three key themes: exploitation, where therapists often feel overwhelmed by heavy workloads and pressures within the system; ethical and moral dilemmas, which arise when therapists must choose between what they believe is best for their clients and the limitations set by their workplaces; and grounded in purpose, which reflects how many therapists, despite ongoing challenges, stay motivated through a strong sense of meaning and commitment to helping others. These findings point to a clear need for change in the community mental health system to better support the well-being of the people providing care. | en |
dc.description.degree | Doctor of Philosophy | en |
dc.format.medium | ETD | en |
dc.identifier.other | vt_gsexam:42718 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10919/125228 | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Virginia Tech | en |
dc.rights | In Copyright | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | en |
dc.subject | burnout | en |
dc.subject | community mental health | en |
dc.subject | clinician well-being | en |
dc.subject | workplace stress | en |
dc.title | Burnout in the Trenches: Unpacking the Systemic Forces Impacting Community Mental Health Clinicians | en |
dc.type | Dissertation | en |
thesis.degree.discipline | Human Development | en |
thesis.degree.grantor | Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University | en |
thesis.degree.level | doctoral | en |
thesis.degree.name | Doctor of Philosophy | en |