Must Kuhn Allow Cross-Paradigm Evidence?
| dc.contributor.author | Patton, Lydia K. | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-12-11T20:20:32Z | en |
| dc.date.available | 2023-12-11T20:20:32Z | en |
| dc.date.issued | 2023-12-01 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Does Kuhn’s thesis that successive paradigms are incommensurable necessarily entail denying that the same evidence can be employed under successive paradigms? In this paper, I will argue no. In supporting that conclusion, I will argue for an even stronger point: Kuhn must be committed to the claim that the same evidence can be employed across paradigms, or his account of anomalies makes no sense. | en |
| dc.description.version | Published version | en |
| dc.format.extent | Pages 211-225 | en |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1220-5400 | en |
| dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en |
| dc.identifier.orcid | Patton, Lydia [0000-0003-2751-1196] | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10919/117178 | en |
| dc.identifier.volume | 67 | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Editura Academiei Romane/Publishing House of the Romanian Academy | en |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en |
| dc.title | Must Kuhn Allow Cross-Paradigm Evidence? | en |
| dc.title.serial | Revue Roumaine de Philosophie | en |
| dc.type | Article - Refereed | en |
| dc.type.dcmitype | Text | en |
| dc.type.other | Article | en |
| pubs.organisational-group | /Virginia Tech | en |
| pubs.organisational-group | /Virginia Tech/All T&R Faculty | en |
| pubs.organisational-group | /Virginia Tech/Liberal Arts and Human Sciences | en |
| pubs.organisational-group | /Virginia Tech/Liberal Arts and Human Sciences/Philosophy | en |
| pubs.organisational-group | /Virginia Tech/Liberal Arts and Human Sciences/CLAHS T&R Faculty | en |