Construct Deficiency in Avoidance Motivation: Development and Validation of a Scale Measuring Vigilance

Bateman, Tanner Alan

Construct Deficiency in Avoidance Motivation: Development and Validation of a Scale Measuring Vigilance

dc.contributor.author	Bateman, Tanner Alan	en
dc.contributor.committeechair	Hauenstein, Neil M. A.	en
dc.contributor.committeemember	Stephens, Robert S.	en
dc.contributor.committeemember	Foti, Roseanne J.	en
dc.contributor.committeemember	Geller, E. Scott	en
dc.contributor.department	Psychology	en
dc.date.accessioned	2017-01-07T09:00:13Z	en
dc.date.available	2017-01-07T09:00:13Z	en
dc.date.issued	2017-01-06	en
dc.description.abstract	Two concerns dominate speculation about the lack of progress in motivational disposition research. First, truly unique dispositional constructs have not been identified since wide acceptance of the approach / avoidance distinction. Second, research has largely neglected to account for context in models of motivated behavior. Effective avoidance has systematically been unassessed in motivation research. Social cognitive theory was used to define an effective avoidance motivational trait, vigilance, as an antecedent to effective regulatory behaviors that are avoidant in nature and/or strategy. Two studies were conducted: First, development and psychometric evaluation of a scale measuring vigilance within the existing motivational trait framework (Heggestad and Kanfer, 2000). Exploratory and confirmatory analyses provided initial validity evidence for the vigilance construct; composed of diligence and error-detection facets. Convergent – discriminant analysis revealed that vigilance is significantly related to approach and avoidance motivational constructs identifying two possible sources of contamination in self-report measures of motivational traits. Measurement items may be contaminated with implied outcomes and measurement items may be contaminated with generalized self-efficacy. In the second study, a within-subjects experiment tested the predictive validity of the vigilance measurement scale for task-specific self-efficacy and performance on a task that rewards avoidance-oriented strategies. Vigilance predicted prevention task-specific self-efficacy ( = .29) in one of two experimental conditions. The validation study also offered construct validity evidence for the vigilance construct. Implications and future directions are discussed.	en
dc.description.degree	Ph. D.	en
dc.format.medium	ETD	en
dc.identifier.other	vt_gsexam:9437	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10919/74003	en
dc.publisher	Virginia Tech	en
dc.rights	In Copyright	en
dc.rights.uri	http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/	en
dc.subject	Vigilance	en
dc.subject	Motivational Traits	en
dc.subject	Self-efficacy	en
dc.subject	Psychometric	en
dc.subject	Validity	en
dc.title	Construct Deficiency in Avoidance Motivation: Development and Validation of a Scale Measuring Vigilance	en
dc.type	Dissertation	en
thesis.degree.discipline	Psychology	en
thesis.degree.grantor	Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University	en
thesis.degree.level	doctoral	en
thesis.degree.name	Ph. D.	en