Effects of three presentation formats in a PSI college level bowling course

dc.contributor.authorCregger, Ronald N.en
dc.contributor.committeechairMetzler, Michael W.en
dc.contributor.committeememberStratton, Richard K.en
dc.contributor.committeememberMoore, David M.en
dc.contributor.committeememberHolmes, Glen A.en
dc.contributor.committeememberHead, J. Thomasen
dc.contributor.committeememberBurton, John K.en
dc.contributor.departmentCurriculum and Instructionen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T21:19:18Zen
dc.date.adate2007-10-02en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T21:19:18Zen
dc.date.issued1994-07-15en
dc.date.rdate2007-10-02en
dc.date.sdate2007-10-02en
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to examine differences in psychomotor learning using three different presentation formats for providing information and facilitating feedback applied in Keller's Personalized System of Instruction (PST) in a college level bowing course. The course was taught as part of the Basic Instruction Program (BIP) at a large, Southeastern university. Utilizing the principles of Russell’s (1980) Novice Spare Conversion System specific sources of data were analyzed to determine significant differences which existed among and within three forms of presentation formats used for providing information related to converting common spares during the spare conversion unit of a beginning level bowling course. Based on results attained from comparisons of specific formats’ unit skills tests and student perceptions, the study determined the effects of each presentation format as a means of presenting information as part of a PSI design in the psychomotor domain. The three presentation formats were: (a) text (T), (b) text and static graphics (TG), and (c) text, static graphics, and animation (TGA). The findings from this investigation focused on the examination of the effects of three forms of presentation formats applied in a specific course in the psychomotor domain. The effects of each format were examined by analyzing data of significant differences among presentation groups in ten comparisons related to their use for providing skill-related information and the facilitation of feedback in a spare conversion unit as a part of a PSI designed bowling course. Based on information gained from the ten comparisons eight were shown to display no significant difference among presentation formats.en
dc.description.degreePh. D.en
dc.format.extentx, 283 leavesen
dc.format.mediumBTDen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.otheretd-10022007-144624en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-10022007-144624/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/39484en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartLD5655.V856_1994.C744.pdfen
dc.relation.isformatofOCLC# 32003456en
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subject.lccLD5655.V856 1994.C744en
dc.subject.lcshBowling -- Study and teachingen
dc.subject.lcshIndividualized instructionen
dc.subject.lcshPhysical education for children -- Study and teaching (Higher)en
dc.titleEffects of three presentation formats in a PSI college level bowling courseen
dc.typeDissertationen
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
thesis.degree.disciplineCurriculum and Instructionen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.namePh. D.en

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LD5655.V856_1994.C744.pdf
Size:
9.92 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: