Deepening Our Understanding of COVID-19 Vaccine Decision-Making amongst Healthcare Workers in Southwest Virginia, USA Using Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis

dc.contributor.authorBendetson, Jesseen
dc.contributor.authorSwann, Mandy C.en
dc.contributor.authorLozano, Aliciaen
dc.contributor.authorWest, Jenniferen
dc.contributor.authorHanlon, Alexandra L.en
dc.contributor.authorCrandell, Ianen
dc.contributor.authorJatta, Maimunaen
dc.contributor.authorSchleupner, Charles J.en
dc.contributor.authorBaffoe-Bonnie, Anthony W.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-10T14:07:57Zen
dc.date.available2023-03-10T14:07:57Zen
dc.date.issued2023-02-27en
dc.date.updated2023-03-10T14:01:38Zen
dc.description.abstractVaccine hesitancy amongst healthcare workers (HCWs) has been a major challenge throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. While many studies have identified HCW characteristics and specific attitudes associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, researchers are still working towards developing a holistic understanding of the psychological constructs that influence COVID-19 vaccine decision-making in this population. Between 15 March and 29 March 2021, we distributed an online survey assessing individual characteristics and vaccine-related perceptions to employees of a not-for-profit healthcare system in Southwest Virginia (N = 2459). We then performed exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to describe patterns of vaccine-related thought amongst HCWs and identify latent psychometric constructs involved in vaccine decision-making. The goodness of model fit was assessed using the Tucker–Lewis Index (TLI), the Comparative Fit Index (CFI), and the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA). Internal consistency and reliability of each factor were assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. EFA identified four latent psychometric constructs: Lack of trust in the COVID-19 vaccine; Anti-science sentiment; Adverse side-effects; and Situational risk assessment. The goodness of EFA model fit was adequate (TLI > 0.90, RMSEA ≤ 0.08) with acceptable internal consistency and reliability for three of four factors (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.70). The CFA model also had adequate goodness of fit (CFI > 0.90, RMSEA ≤ 0.08). We believe the psychometric constructs identified in this study can provide a useful framework for interventions to improve vaccine uptake amongst this critical population.en
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationBendetson, J.; Swann, M.C.; Lozano, A.; West, J.; Hanlon, A.L.; Crandell, I.; Jatta, M.; Schleupner, C.J.; Baffoe-Bonnie, A. Deepening Our Understanding of COVID-19 Vaccine Decision-Making amongst Healthcare Workers in Southwest Virginia, USA Using Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Vaccines 2023, 11, 556.en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11030556en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/114068en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMDPIen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectvaccineen
dc.subjecthesitancyen
dc.subjecthealthcare workersen
dc.subjectCOVID-19en
dc.subjectpsychometric constructsen
dc.subjectfactor analysisen
dc.titleDeepening Our Understanding of COVID-19 Vaccine Decision-Making amongst Healthcare Workers in Southwest Virginia, USA Using Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysisen
dc.title.serialVaccinesen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
vaccines-11-00556.pdf
Size:
504.45 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: