Recommended Guidelines for the Conduct and Evaluation of Prognostic Studies in Veterinary Oncology

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorWebster, J. D.en
dc.contributor.authorDennis, M. M.en
dc.contributor.authorDervisis, Nikolaos G.en
dc.contributor.authorHeller, J.en
dc.contributor.authorBacon, N. J.en
dc.contributor.authorBergman, P. J.en
dc.contributor.authorBienzle, D.en
dc.contributor.authorCassali, G.en
dc.contributor.authorCastagnaro, M.en
dc.contributor.authorCullen, J.en
dc.contributor.authorEsplin, D. G.en
dc.contributor.authorPena, L.en
dc.contributor.authorGoldschmidt, M. H.en
dc.contributor.authorHahn, K. A.en
dc.contributor.authorHenry, C. J.en
dc.contributor.authorHellmen, E.en
dc.contributor.authorKamstock, D.en
dc.contributor.authorKirpensteijn, J.en
dc.contributor.authorKitchell, B. E.en
dc.contributor.authorAmorim, R. L.en
dc.contributor.authorLenz, S. D.en
dc.contributor.authorLipscomb, T. P.en
dc.contributor.authorMcEntee, M.en
dc.contributor.authorMcGill, L. D.en
dc.contributor.authorMcKnight, C. A.en
dc.contributor.authorMcManus, P. M.en
dc.contributor.authorMoore, A. S.en
dc.contributor.authorMoore, P. F.en
dc.contributor.authorMoroff, S. D.en
dc.contributor.authorNakayama, H.en
dc.contributor.authorNorthrup, N. C.en
dc.contributor.authorSarli, G.en
dc.contributor.authorScase, T.en
dc.contributor.authorSorenmo, K.en
dc.contributor.authorSchulman, F. Y.en
dc.contributor.authorShoieb, A. M.en
dc.contributor.authorSmedley, R. C.en
dc.contributor.authorSpangler, W. L.en
dc.contributor.authorTeske, E.en
dc.contributor.authorThamm, D. H.en
dc.contributor.authorValli, V. E.en
dc.contributor.authorVernau, W.en
dc.contributor.authorvon Euler, H.en
dc.contributor.authorWithrow, S. J.en
dc.contributor.authorWeisbrode, S. E.en
dc.contributor.authorYager, J.en
dc.contributor.authorKiupel, M.en
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-15T20:50:01Zen
dc.date.available2016-11-15T20:50:01Zen
dc.date.issued2011-01-01en
dc.description.abstractThere is an increasing need for more accurate prognostic and predictive markers in veterinary oncology because of an increasing number of treatment options, the increased financial costs associated with treatment, and the emotional stress experienced by owners in association with the disease and its treatment. Numerous studies have evaluated potential prognostic and predictive markers for veterinary neoplastic diseases, but there are no established guidelines or standards for the conduct and reporting of prognostic studies in veterinary medicine. This lack of standardization has made the evaluation and comparison of studies difficult. Most important, translating these results to clinical applications is problematic. To address this issue, the American College of Veterinary Pathologists’ Oncology Committee organized an initiative to establish guidelines for the conduct and reporting of prognostic studies in veterinary oncology. The goal of this initiative is to increase the quality and standardization of veterinary prognostic studies to facilitate independent evaluation, validation, comparison, and implementation of study results. This article represents a consensus statement on the conduct and reporting of prognostic studies in veterinary oncology from veterinary pathologists and oncologists from around the world. These guidelines should be considered a recommendation based on the current state of knowledge in the field, and they will need to be continually reevaluated and revised as the field of veterinary oncology continues to progress. As mentioned, these guidelines were developed through an initiative of the American College of Veterinary Pathologists’ Oncology Committee, and they have been reviewed and endorsed by the World Small Animal Veterinary Association.en
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
dc.format.extent7 - 18 (12) page(s)en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0300985810377187en
dc.identifier.issn0300-9858en
dc.identifier.issue1en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/73460en
dc.identifier.volume48en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSAGEen
dc.relation.urihttp://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000287200500002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=930d57c9ac61a043676db62af60056c1en
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectPathologyen
dc.subjectVeterinary Sciencesen
dc.subjectcanceren
dc.subjectguidelinesen
dc.subjectprognosticationen
dc.subjectstandardizationen
dc.subjectveterinary oncologyen
dc.subjectMAST-CELL TUMORSen
dc.subjectMULTIVARIATE DATA-ANALYSISen
dc.subjectMINIMUM INFORMATIONen
dc.subjectSURVIVAL ANALYSISen
dc.subjectAPPENDICULAR OSTEOSARCOMAen
dc.subjectPROTEIN EXPRESSIONen
dc.subjectCONSORT STATEMENTen
dc.subjectDOGSen
dc.subjectIMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRYen
dc.subjectQUALITYen
dc.titleRecommended Guidelines for the Conduct and Evaluation of Prognostic Studies in Veterinary Oncologyen
dc.title.serialVeterinary Pathologyen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Techen
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech/All T&R Facultyen
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech/Faculty of Health Sciencesen
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech/Veterinary Medicineen
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech/Veterinary Medicine/CVM T&R Facultyen
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech/Veterinary Medicine/Small Animal Clinical Sciencesen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Recommended guidelines for the conduct and evaluation of prognostic studies in veterinary oncology.pdf
Size:
203.88 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
VTUL_Distribution_License_2016_05_09.pdf
Size:
18.09 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download

Collections

All Faculty Deposits
Scholarly Works, Small Animal Clinical Sciences