Modeling wet headwater stream networks across multiple flow conditions in the Appalachian Highlands

dc.contributor.authorJensen, Carrie K.en
dc.contributor.authorMcGuire, Kevin J.en
dc.contributor.authorShao, Yangen
dc.contributor.authorDolloff, C. Andrewen
dc.contributor.departmentForest Resources and Environmental Conservationen
dc.contributor.departmentGeographyen
dc.contributor.departmentVirginia Water Resources Research Centeren
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-07T14:46:17Zen
dc.date.available2018-11-07T14:46:17Zen
dc.date.issued2018-05-25en
dc.description.abstractDespite the advancement of remote sensing and geospatial technology in recent decades, maps of headwater streams continue to have high uncertainty and fail to adequately characterize temporary streams that expand and contract in the wet length. However, watershed management and policy increasingly require information regarding the spatial and temporal variability of flow along streams. We used extensive field data on wet stream length at different flows to create logistic regression models of stream network dynamics for four physiographic provinces of the Appalachian Highlands: New England, Appalachian Plateau, Valley and Ridge, and Blue Ridge. The topographic wetness index (TWI) was the most important parameter in all four models, and the topographic position index (TPI) further improved model performance in the Appalachian Plateau, Valley and Ridge, and Blue Ridge. We included stream runoff at the catchment outlet as a model predictor to represent the wetness state of the catchment, but adjustment of the probability threshold defining wet stream presence/absence to high values for low flows was the primary mechanism for approximating network extent at multiple flow conditions. Classification accuracy was high overall (> 0.90), and McFadden's pseudo R2 values ranged from 0.69 for the New England model to 0.79 in the Appalachian Plateau. More notable errors included an overestimation of wet stream length in wide valleys and inaccurate reach locations amid boulder deposits and along headwardly eroding tributaries. Logistic regression was generally successful for modeling headwater streams at high and low flows with only a few simple terrain metrics. Modification and application of this modeling approach to other regions or larger areas would be relatively easy and provide a more accurate portrayal of temporary headwaters than existing datasets.en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4431en
dc.identifier.issue13en
dc.identifier.orcidMcGuire, Kevin J. [0000-0001-5751-3956]en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/85690en
dc.identifier.volume43en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherWileyen
dc.rightsCreative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/en
dc.subjectLogistic regressionen
dc.subjectPhysiographic provinceen
dc.subjectStream lengthen
dc.subjectTemporary streamsen
dc.subjectGeospatial terrain analysisen
dc.titleModeling wet headwater stream networks across multiple flow conditions in the Appalachian Highlandsen
dc.title.serialEarth Surface Processes and Landformsen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ja_2018_dolloff_001.pdf
Size:
2.32 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.5 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: