The Effects of Cueing Learners to a Transfer Problem Prior to Instruction

dc.contributor.authorPienkowski, Nathanen
dc.contributor.committeechairMoore, David M.en
dc.contributor.committeememberPotter, Kenneth R.en
dc.contributor.committeememberSingh, Kusumen
dc.contributor.committeememberCennamo, Katherine S.en
dc.contributor.committeememberBurton, John K.en
dc.contributor.departmentTeaching and Learningen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T20:07:28Zen
dc.date.adate2002-03-05en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T20:07:28Zen
dc.date.issued2002-02-01en
dc.date.rdate2003-03-05en
dc.date.sdate2002-02-15en
dc.description.abstractPrior research indicates that cueing or priming an individual prior to exposing them to a basic stimulus, either visual or verbal, will direct their perception and attention toward specific aspects of that stimulus. Furthermore, it suggests that those aspects of the stimulus that are attended or perceived may be related by the extent to which they afford the resolution of a problem, need, or state invoked by the cued phenomenon. The purpose of this study was to determine whether similar results would be found using content of a greater scale. In other words, the purpose was to determine whether the same cueing and priming results found using words and phrases would apply using entire instructional modules. Specifically, this study attempted to determine whether cuing individuals to an expected outcome performance prior to instruction would cause them to focus on those parts of the instruction needed to succeed on the outcome performance. It was hypothesized that prior cuing would result in superior performance on a transfer problem. Similarly, it was also hypothesized that, since the learner's attention would be directed toward specific parts of the instruction to the neglect of others, overall memory retention would be diminished for learners that were cued. To test these hypotheses, an experimental design was used with two overall groups: one receiving prior exposure to a transfer problem and one not. In addition, in order to avoid the possibility that any results could be generalized only to the subject matter being taught, two different subject domains were used: statistics and biology. Therefore, 115 undergraduate students were randomly assigned to one of four groups: (a) a statistics group receiving prior exposure to a transfer problem; (c) a statistics group without prior exposure to a transfer problem; (b) a biology group receiving prior exposure to a transfer problem; (d) a biology group without prior exposure to a transfer problem. Following instruction, each group received the transfer problem and recall test appropriate for the subject area covered during their instruction (statistics or biology). The resulting data was analyzed using two ANOVAs, one for retention and one for transfer. Neither ANOVA yielded significant results. Hence, the results reported in this study do not support either hypothesis.en
dc.description.degreePh. D.en
dc.identifier.otheretd-02152002-152936en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-02152002-152936/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/26204en
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartNathansfinal.pdfen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectinstructional sequenceen
dc.subjectcueingen
dc.subjecttransferen
dc.subjectprimingen
dc.titleThe Effects of Cueing Learners to a Transfer Problem Prior to Instructionen
dc.typeDissertationen
thesis.degree.disciplineCurriculum and Instructionen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.namePh. D.en

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Nathansfinal.pdf
Size:
1.1 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format