A Multi-Method Analysis of Hospital Readmissions and Medicare Penalties

dc.contributor.authorMauti, Eddah Kwambokaen
dc.contributor.committeechairHosseinichimeh, Niyoushaen
dc.contributor.committeememberVan Aken, Eileen Mortonen
dc.contributor.committeememberDickerson, Deborah Elspethen
dc.contributor.committeememberAbedi, Vidaen
dc.contributor.departmentIndustrial and Systems Engineeringen
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-05T09:00:36Zen
dc.date.available2026-02-05T09:00:36Zen
dc.date.issued2026-02-04en
dc.description.abstractHospital readmissions can worsen patient outcomes and contribute to substantial healthcare costs. Because many readmissions are considered preventable, reducing them has become a national priority in the United States, with Medicare penalizing hospitals whose readmission rates exceed benchmarks. This research examines factors associated with readmissions, identifies the types of hospitals most likely to receive penalties, and evaluates how hospitals respond to these penalties. The work is presented in three essays. The first essay provides a comprehensive literature review of factors associated with 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year stroke readmissions, along with a meta-analysis of U.S. studies on 30-day stroke readmissions. The findings show that readmissions increase with advanced age and a high comorbidity burden, and decrease with effective discharge planning, early follow-up with a primary care physician, and receipt of thrombolytic therapy. The second essay investigates hospital characteristics associated with Medicare readmission penalties, with a particular focus on affiliation with a healthcare system. Using Poisson regression, the analysis shows that hospitals affiliated with a healthcare system receive more penalties than non-affiliated hospitals, and that smaller hospitals are less likely to be penalized compared to larger hospitals. The third essay evaluates whether hospitals are more motivated to reduce readmissions by reputational pressure related to high readmission rates or by the financial losses associated with penalties. Using system dynamics modeling of Massachusetts hospitals, reputational pressure emerges as the stronger motivator. The analysis also identifies variation in sensitivity: specialty hospitals compared to community hospitals and hospitals with lower net incomes compared to those with higher net incomes are more sensitive to reducing readmissions, whereas urban hospitals are less sensitive than rural hospitals. Overall, this dissertation offers valuable insights into the factors driving hospital readmissions and identifies strategies to effectively reduce them.en
dc.description.abstractgeneralA hospital readmission occurs when a patient is admitted again after being discharged. These repeat visits can lead to poorer health outcomes and increase healthcare costs. Because many readmissions can be prevented, Medicare penalizes hospitals with high readmission rates to encourage better care. This research looks at hospital readmissions in three ways: why they happen, which hospitals are most likely to be penalized, and what motivates hospitals to reduce them. First, the study examines stroke patients and finds that older adults and those with multiple health conditions are more likely to return to the hospital. However, clear discharge instructions, help with medications, and early follow-up visits can greatly lower the risk of readmission. Next, the research shows that smaller hospitals tend to receive fewer Medicare penalties than larger hospitals, while hospitals that are part of a healthcare system are more likely to be penalized than independent hospitals. Finally, the study finds that hospitals in Massachusetts are more motivated to reduce readmissions to protect their reputation than to avoid financial penalties. Overall, these findings help explain why readmissions occur and how hospitals react to Medicare policies, offering insights for improving patient care and health outcomes.en
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophyen
dc.format.mediumETDen
dc.identifier.othervt_gsexam:45465en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/141161en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectReadmissionsen
dc.subjectMedicare Penaltiesen
dc.subjectHospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP)en
dc.subjectStrokeen
dc.subjectIschemic Strokeen
dc.subjectHealthcare System Affiliationen
dc.subjectPhysicianen
dc.subjectFinancial Incentivesen
dc.subjectReputationen
dc.subjectReputational Pressureen
dc.titleA Multi-Method Analysis of Hospital Readmissions and Medicare Penaltiesen
dc.typeDissertationen
thesis.degree.disciplineIndustrial and Systems Engineeringen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
Mauti_EK_D_2026.pdf
Size:
4.63 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format