The congressional intent, implementation and utilization of section 202(d) linkage funds of the Comprehensive employment and training act as amended in 1978

Abstract

In 1978 Congress amended the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (CETA) to include, among other things, Section 202(d) which provided funds to state governors to encourage coordination and establish linkages between CETA and educational agencies and institutions. The purpose of this study were to examine the Congressional intent behind Section 202(d), to trace the procedures used to implement Section 202(d) activities, to identify and codify Section 202(d) activities, and to make recommendations regarding the future of Section 202 (d).

The research was a policy impact study. In order to formalize the study, the purposes were broken into specific research questions. The questions framed specific stages of research and thereby connected the conceptual and analytical frameworks.

The conceptual framework included four distinct stages, each separate from but related to the other stages. Within a given stage data were collected, methodologies applied and outcomes reported. Stage one identified the context and inputs leading to the enactment of Section 202(d) into CETA amendments of 1978. Historical methodologies were used and focused upon source documents and personal interview. Stage two traced the process through the bureaucratic structure to transform Section 202 (d) from a legislative amendment to an administrative guideline. Guidelines, memorandum, and related documents including the published rules and regulations were examined. Stage three collected and interpreted product data provided by the State Employment and Training Council directors. Stage four produced recommendations dnd comment concerning the final research conclusions.

It was concluded that the set-aside grant funding is not adequate to bring about the organizational changes necessary for collaboration of the two systems. Haphazard projects and programs may have short-term benefits; however, the overall, long-term problem still exists.

Recommendations include that Congress should reconsider its current coordination strategy. In addition, while the governor is in an advantageous position to accomplish some coordination and provide supportive services to all prime sponsors and educational agencies, the need for incentive grants is at the local level. And finally, the states need a systematic approach or model to begin coordinating services.