Field Performance of Epoxy-Coated Reinforcing Steel in Virginia Bridge Decks

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorPyc, Wioleta A.en
dc.contributor.committeechairWeyers, Richard E.en
dc.contributor.committeememberDillard, John G.en
dc.contributor.committeememberSprinkel, Michael M.en
dc.contributor.committeememberWightman, James P.en
dc.contributor.committeememberDuke, John C. Jr.en
dc.contributor.committeememberCousins, Thomas E.en
dc.contributor.departmentCivil Engineeringen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T20:17:46Zen
dc.date.adate1998-02-11en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T20:17:46Zen
dc.date.issued1998-09-04en
dc.date.rdate1998-02-11en
dc.date.sdate1998-10-30en
dc.description.abstractThe corrosion protection performance of epoxy-coated reinforcing steel (ECR) was evaluated in 18 concrete bridge decks in Virginia in 1997. The decks were 2 to 20 years old at the time of the investigation. The concrete bridge deck inspections included crack survey and cover depth determination in the right traffic lane. Maximum of 12 cores with the top reinforcement randomly located in the lowest 12th percentile cover depth and 3 cores with the truss bars were drilled from each bridge deck. The concrete core evaluation included visual examination and determination of carbonation depth, moisture content, absorption, percent saturation and chloride content at 13 mm depth. Rapid chloride permeability test was also performed for the surface and base concrete on samples obtained from cores containing truss bars. The ECR inspection consisted of visual examination and damage evaluation, coating thickness and adhesion determination. The condition of the steel underneath the epoxy coating was also evaluated. Adhesion loss of the epoxy coating to the steel surface was detected for 4 years old bridge decks. The epoxy coating had debonded from the reinforcing bar before the chloride arrival. Visible signs of a possibility of a corrosion process underneath the coating suggest that ECR will not provide any or little additional service life for concrete bridge decks in comparison to black steel. Other systems, which will provide longer protection with a higher degree of reliability against chloride induced corrosion of steel in concrete, should be considered.en
dc.description.degreePh. D.en
dc.identifier.otheretd-102998-190256en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-102998-190256/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/29399en
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartPYCPHD.pdfen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectadhesionen
dc.subjectconcreteen
dc.subjectbridge decksen
dc.subjectepoxy-coated reinforcement (ECR)en
dc.titleField Performance of Epoxy-Coated Reinforcing Steel in Virginia Bridge Decksen
dc.typeDissertationen
thesis.degree.disciplineCivil Engineeringen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.namePh. D.en

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PYCPHD.pdf
Size:
1.2 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Doctoral Dissertations