Multi-Mode Flight Simulation and Energy-Aware Coverage Path Planning for a Lift+Cruise QuadPlane

dc.contributor.authorMathur, Akshayen
dc.contributor.authorAtkins, Ellaen
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-28T17:18:20Zen
dc.date.available2025-04-28T17:18:20Zen
dc.date.issued2025-04-08en
dc.date.updated2025-04-25T13:46:26Zen
dc.description.abstractThis paper describes flight planning supported by modeling, guidance, and feedback control for an electric Vertical Take-Off and Landing (eVTOL) QuadPlane small Uncrewed Aircraft System (sUAS). Five Lift+Cruise sUAS waypoint types are defined and used to construct smooth flight path geometries and acceleration profiles. Novel accelerated coverage flight plan segments for hover (Lift) and coverage (Cruise) waypoint types are defined as a complement to traditional fly-over, fly-by, and Dubins path waypoint transit solutions. Carrot-chasing guidance shows a tradeoff between tracking accuracy and control stability as a function of the carrot time step. Experimentally validated aerodynamic and thrust models for vertical, forward, and hybrid flight modes are developed as a function of airspeed and angle of attack from wind tunnel data. A QuadPlane feedback controller augments classical multicopter and fixed-wing controllers with a hybrid control mode that combines multicopter and aircraft control actuators to add a controllable pitch degree of freedom at the cost of increased energy use. Multi-mode flight simulations show Cruise mode to be the most energy efficient with a relatively large turning radius constraint, while quadrotor mode enables hover and smaller radius turns. Energy efficiency analysis over QuadPlane plans with modest inter-waypoint distances indicates cruise or aircraft mode is <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>30</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> more energy efficient overall than quadrotor mode. Energy-aware coverage planner simulation results show fly-coverage (cruise) waypoints are always the most efficient given long distances between waypoints. A Pareto analysis of energy use versus area coverage is presented to analyze waypoint-type tradeoffs in case studies with closely spaced waypoints. Coverage planning and guidance methods from this paper can be applied to any Lift+Cruise aircraft configuration requiring waypoint flight mode optimization over energy and coverage metrics.en
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationMathur, A.; Atkins, E. Multi-Mode Flight Simulation and Energy-Aware Coverage Path Planning for a Lift+Cruise QuadPlane. Drones 2025, 9, 287.en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/drones9040287en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/126248en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMDPIen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.titleMulti-Mode Flight Simulation and Energy-Aware Coverage Path Planning for a Lift+Cruise QuadPlaneen
dc.title.serialDronesen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
drones-09-00287-v2.pdf
Size:
16.28 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.5 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: