Cost analysis of three southwest Virginia special education programs

dc.contributor.authorMoche, Joanne Spiersen
dc.contributor.committeecochairJones, Philip R.en
dc.contributor.committeecochairSalmon, Richarden
dc.contributor.committeememberMcGrady, Harold J.en
dc.contributor.committeememberFortune, Jimmie C.en
dc.contributor.committeememberEarthman, Glen I.en
dc.contributor.committeememberRomano, Lewisen
dc.contributor.departmentAdministration and Supervision of Special Educationen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T21:10:02Zen
dc.date.adate2009-03-04en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T21:10:02Zen
dc.date.issued1995en
dc.date.rdate2009-03-04en
dc.date.sdate2009-03-04en
dc.description.abstractSchool funding is one of the most critical issues in public education today. Jordan & Lyons (1992) have predicted that the great debate of the 1990s will be over what proportion of available funds should be spent on programs for special-needs students. Special education has held a prominent place in fiscal discussions and analyses since the passage of the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975. The Education for All Handicapped Children Act (reauthorized as Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 1990) required special educational programs and services for disabled students and provided a funding mechanism to assist states who chose to participate in this discretionary grant program. Given the dramatic rise in expenditures on those special education programs, policy-makers at all levels require cost and fiscal policy information to make informed decisions regarding the provision of special education services (Jordan & Lyons, 1992; Center for Special Education Finance, 1993). To meet that need, the Center for Special Education Finance was funded by the U.S. Department of Education to address fiscal issues including compilation of special education expenditure statistics (Council of Administrators of Special Education, 1993). The current study offered a significant contribution to that national objective. The cost analysis method introduced in this study, called the Moche Cost Analysis of Public Education or CAPE Model, provided greater sensitivity, accuracy, and flexibility than prior methods. It responded to changing service delivery models emerging from the education reform and restructuring movements. The CAPE Model was used to examine and compare costs of regular elementary education, regular secondary education, elementary special education, and secondary special education. Special education costs also were compared across disability categories and service delivery environments. CAPE can be adapted easily to identify expenditures by building level and programs other than special education. Results can be customized for comparison with state funding formulas. CAPE calculations can be completed manually or through use of the Moche CAPE computer spreadsheet program (Moche, 1995).en
dc.description.degreeEd. D.en
dc.format.extentxii, 173 leavesen
dc.format.mediumBTDen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.otheretd-03042009-041314en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-03042009-041314/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/37483en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartLD5655.V856_1995.M634.pdfen
dc.relation.isformatofOCLC# 33191599en
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectdisabilitiesen
dc.subjectexpendituresen
dc.subjectfinanceen
dc.subject.lccLD5655.V856 1995.M634en
dc.titleCost analysis of three southwest Virginia special education programsen
dc.typeDissertationen
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
thesis.degree.disciplineAdministration and Supervision of Special Educationen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Educationen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LD5655.V856_1995.M634.pdf
Size:
8.43 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: