Identification of Academic Program Strengths and Weaknesses through Use of a Prototype Systematic Tool

dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Harunen
dc.contributor.committeechairLockee, Barbara B.en
dc.contributor.committeecochairPotter, Kenneth R.en
dc.contributor.committeememberOgle, Gwendolyn J.en
dc.contributor.committeememberBurton, John K.en
dc.contributor.departmentLearning Sciences and Technologiesen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T20:09:22Zen
dc.date.adate2007-04-25en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T20:09:22Zen
dc.date.issued2007-03-28en
dc.date.rdate2010-04-25en
dc.date.sdate2007-04-11en
dc.description.abstractBecause of the rapid development of the use of computers in education, as well as the introduction of the World Wide Web (WWW), a growing number of web-based educational applications/tools have been developed and implemented to help both educators and administrators in the field of education. In order to assist program directors and faculty members in determining whether or not there is a gap between the current situation of the program and the desired situation of the program and whether or not program objectives meet accreditation standards, there is a need for a tool that works effectively and efficiently. However, literature review showed that there is no automated tool specifically used for determining strengths and weaknesses of an academic program, and there is a lack of research in this area. In Chapter 1, the author's intent is to discuss the purpose behind this developmental research and to provide a literature review that serves as the basis for the design of such an automated tool. This review investigates the following issues: objectives related to programs and courses, taxonomies of educational objectives, curriculum evaluation, accreditation and standards, automated tools, and a brief collaborative create-adapt-generalize model. Chapter 2 discusses the design and development of the automated tool as well as methodology focusing on the instructional design model and its steps. Chapter 3 presents the results of the expert review process and possible solutions for the problems identified during the expert review process. Also the Appendices include the documentation used during the expert review process.en
dc.description.degreePh. D.en
dc.identifier.otheretd-04112007-144403en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-04112007-144403/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/26774en
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartDissertation-Yilmaz-finalized.pdfen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectinstructional design and developmenten
dc.subjectdatabase driven web-based toolen
dc.subjectdevelopmental researchen
dc.subjectprogram evaluationen
dc.subjectaccreditation toolen
dc.titleIdentification of Academic Program Strengths and Weaknesses through Use of a Prototype Systematic Toolen
dc.typeDissertationen
thesis.degree.disciplineCurriculum and Instruction (Instructional Design and Technology)en
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.namePh. D.en

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Dissertation-Yilmaz-finalized.pdf
Size:
1.36 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format