VTechWorks staff will be away for the Thanksgiving holiday beginning at noon on Wednesday, November 22, through Friday, November 24, and will not be replying to requests during this time. Thank you for your patience, and happy holidays!

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEmenheiser, Joseph Carlen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-02-22en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T20:31:37Z
dc.date.available2009-02-22en_US
dc.date.available2014-03-14T20:31:37Z
dc.date.issued2009-01-27en_US
dc.date.submitted2009-02-08en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-02082009-143828en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/31178
dc.description.abstractUltrasound technology allows in vivo estimation of carcass composition. Successful genetic evaluation of ultrasonic measures depends upon technician certification guidelines and a viable common-endpoint adjustment strategy for field data. Four technicians and three image interpreters ultrasonically evaluated 172 lambs to determine accuracy and repeatability of loin eye area (LEA), backfat thickness (BF), and body wall thickness (BW) estimations. Correlations between ultrasonic and carcass measurements were 0.66, 0.78, and 0.73 for LEA, BF, and BW, respectively. Performance was similar among technicians and interpreters. Mean bias ranged from -1.30 to -2.66 cm2, -0.12 to -0.17 cm, and 0.14 to -0.03 cm, for LEA, BF, and BW, respectively; prediction standard errors ranged from 1.86 to 2.22 cm2, 0.12 to 0.14 cm, and 0.35 to 0.38 cm, respectively. Repeatability standard errors ranged from 1.61 to 2.45 cm2, 0.07 to 0.11 cm, and 0.36 to 0.42 cm for LEA, BF, and BW, respectively. Changes in ultrasonic measurements were evaluated using seven serial scans on 24 growing Suffolk ram lambs. All equations had similar goodness of fit. Equations were tested on other populations, including similarly-managed rams across breeds and years and ewe lambs fed for slower gain. Correlations between predicted and actual measures ranged from 0.78 to 0.87 for BF and 0.66 to 0.93 for LEA in winter-born rams, were only slightly lower in fall-born rams, and ranged from 0.72 to 0.74 for BF and 0.54 to 0.76 for LEA in ewe lambs. Of the equations tested, linear and allometric forms appear best for general use.en_US
dc.publisherVirginia Techen_US
dc.relation.haspartEmenheiser_ETD.pdfen_US
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to Virginia Tech or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.subjectendpoint adjustmenten_US
dc.subjectgrowthen_US
dc.subjectultrasounden_US
dc.subjectcompositionen_US
dc.subjectcarcassen_US
dc.subjectlamben_US
dc.titleUse of ultrasound technology in the genetic improvement of U.S. lamb compositionen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentAnimal and Poultry Sciencesen_US
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen_US
thesis.degree.levelmastersen_US
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen_US
dc.contributor.committeechairNotter, David R.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberGreiner, Scott P.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberLewis, Ronald M.en_US
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-02082009-143828/en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record