Virginia Tech
    • Log in
    View Item 
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • ETDs: Virginia Tech Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Masters Theses
    • View Item
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • ETDs: Virginia Tech Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Masters Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Comparative Growth of All-Female Versus Mixed Sex Yellow Perch (Perca flavescens) in Recirculating Aquaculture Systems

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    etd.pdf (483.6Kb)
    Downloads: 272
    CoverPage.pdf (3.313Kb)
    Downloads: 30
    ABSTRACT.pdf (7.753Kb)
    Downloads: 78
    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.pdf (3.899Kb)
    Downloads: 25
    TABLECONTENTS.pdf (11.88Kb)
    Downloads: 25
    Chpt1.pdf (82.60Kb)
    Downloads: 500
    NewChpt2.pdf (335.9Kb)
    Downloads: 166
    Chpt3.pdf (44.45Kb)
    Downloads: 1427
    VITA1.pdf (4.178Kb)
    Downloads: 68
    Date
    1999-05-20
    Author
    Schmitz, Mark Harvey
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Nine, production-scale, recirculating aquaculture systems were utilized to compare the growth parameters between all-female and mixed sex yellow perch stocks. Each system was stocked with 455 fish m⁻³ and contained one of three different biofilter types: a rotating biological contactor, a trickling filter or a bead filter. The all-female fingerlings (S1) used were originally derived from Lake Mendota, Wisconsin. The mixed-sex fingerlings (S2) used were originally derived from Lake Erie. Temperature and photoperiod (23°C, 16H-L) were maintained at levels for optimal growth. Absolute growth rates ranged from 0.27-0.48 g/day. Mean final density within treatments was 42.8 kg/m³ and ranged from 37.2-50.2 kg/m³. The main effect of stock did not have a significant effect on growth (p > .1). All-female treatments exhibited more uniform growth. The main effect of filter type did have a significant effect on fish growth (p < .01), with fish in tanks containing trickling filters exhibiting significantly higher growth. Total feed conversion averaged 1.61 across all treatments and ranged from 1.38-1.78. S1 treatments consumed a significantly higher percent body weight per day than S2 treatments (p < .05). Analysis of PIT tagged individuals revealed that the mean relative growth rate was significantly higher in S2 individuals (513.9%) compared to S1 individuals (315.3%: p < .01). S2 females (597.8%) grew 1.9 times faster than S1 females (315.3%: p < .01). Within S2 individuals, females (597.8%) grew 1.5 times faster than males (395.2%: p < .05). For all individuals, 33.6% of the variation in final weight was explained by the variation in initial weight. Differences in the geographic strain or culture history of these stocks may have had a larger overall effect on growth than sexual classification (all- female or mixed sex). Dress percentage of skin-on butterfly fillets was examined in 20 individuals per stock and in six groups of 20 individuals per stock. Within S2 individuals, 73.7% were female. Mean fillet yield was significantly greater in S1 individuals (47.6%) compared to S2 individuals (43.0%: p < .01). Mean GSI in S1 individuals (1.01%) was significantly higher than S2 individuals (0.54%: p < .05). Within S2 individuals, mean GSI was significantly higher in females (0.70%) when compared to males (0.08%: p < .05). Fillet yield was significantly greater in S1 groups (47.2%) compared to S2 groups (44.9%: p < .01). Within each stock fillet yield increased with size. The difference in fillet yield demonstrated between these stocks may be a result of differences in strain of origin. The identification of superior yellow perch strains or strain crosses with regard to growth rate and fillet percentage is of considerable importance to the industry.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10919/42798
    Collections
    • Masters Theses [22187]

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us
     

     

    VTechWorks

    AboutPoliciesHelp

    Browse

    All of VTechWorksCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Log inRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us